HC 645646 - ACORDAO

Como as instâncias ordinárias reconheceram a materialidade do crime e a existência de indícios suficientes de autoria com fundamento no conjunto probatório, a modificação desse entendimento exigiria reexame das provas, vedado no habeas corpus/agravo regimental; portanto não há ilegalidade apta a justificar a...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LUIZ CARLOS RENOVATO; Órgão De Defesa/parte Assistente: DEFENSORIA PÚBLICA ESTADUAL
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 21 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Pronúncia (fase Do Judicium Accusationis)
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido
Legal Topics: Pronúncia, In Dubio Pro Societate, Presunção Constitucional De Inocência, Art. 413 Do CPP, Materialidade Do Delito, Indícios Suficientes De Autoria, Reexame Do Acervo Fático Probatório (súmula N. 7 Do Stj)

Direito Penal Processo Penal Habeas Corpus Júri Pronúncia In Dubio Pro Societate Presunção Constitucional De Inocência Art. 413 Do CPP +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2

Parties

LUIZ CARLOS RENOVATO

Agravante

DEFENSORIA PÚBLICA ESTADUAL

Órgão De Defesa/parte Assistente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Pronúncia (fase Do Judicium Accusationis)

Legal Issues

1 inexistência de indícios suficientes de autoria
2 inaplicabilidade do princípio in dubio pro societate
3 presunção constitucional de inocência

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental
Manter a decisão de pronúncia

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.