HC 927006 - DECISAO

O habeas corpus ficou prejudicado em razão de, no juízo de primeiro grau, ter sido concedida liberdade provisória ao paciente e ter sido expedido alvará de soltura (Processo n. 1513673-44.2024.8.26.0228).

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: Gabriel Vieira da Silva
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 13 August 2024
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado
Outcome: Writ prejudicado.
Legal Topics: Receptação, Adulteração De Sinal Identificador De Veículo Automotor, Prisão Preventiva, Liberdade Provisória, Perda De Objeto

Direito Penal Processo Penal Habeas Corpus Receptação Adulteração De Sinal Identificador De Veículo Automotor Prisão Preventiva Liberdade Provisória Perda De Objeto

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Gabriel Vieira da Silva

Paciente

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado

Legal Issues

1 revogação da prisão preventiva
2 superveniente concessão da liberdade provisória
3 perda de objeto do writ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Writ prejudicado.

Orders

Julgo prejudicado o writ.
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.