HC 668585 - ACORDAO

O agravo regimental foi improvido porque a controvérsia não revela ilegalidade patente apta a mitigar a Súmula 691/STF, e a prisão preventiva encontra fundamentação idônea na reiteração delitiva e na condenação definitiva anterior, circunstâncias que tornam insuficientes as medidas cautelares alternativas para...

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 14 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Decisão Regimental Sobre Agravo Contra Indeferimento Liminar
Outcome: agravo regimental improvido
Legal Topics: Receptação Simples, Prisão Preventiva, Reiteração Delitiva, Súmula 691/stf, Medidas Cautelares Alternativas, Habeas Corpus

Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Receptação Simples Prisão Preventiva Reiteração Delitiva Súmula 691/stf Medidas Cautelares Alternativas Habeas Corpus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Decisão Regimental Sobre Agravo Contra Indeferimento Liminar

Legal Issues

1 legalidade da prisão preventiva decretada
2 aplicabilidade da Súmula 691 do STF ao caso
3 possibilidade de substituição da prisão preventiva por medidas cautelares alternativas

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

agravo regimental improvido

Orders

negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.