HC 882274 - DECISAO

Concedeu-se o habeas corpus porque o regime inicial fechado foi imposto sem motivao idnea, diante da pena fixada em 4 anos, da...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: IURI DA SILVA RAMOS; Manifestante: Ministério Público Federal; Tribunal a Quo: Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 15 February 2024
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Ordem Concedida
Outcome: Ordem concedida para determinar a imediata inserInser...
Legal Topics: Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena, Habeas Corpus, Motiva, S

Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena Habeas Corpus Motiva S

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Sign in to unlock

Parties

IURI DA SILVA RAMOS

Paciente

Ministério Público Federal

Manifestante

Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo

Tribunal a Quo

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Ordem Concedida

Legal Issues

1 constrangimento ilegal pela fixa
2 necessidade de motiva

Ratio Decidendi

Concedeu-se o habeas corpus porque o regime inicial fechado foi imposto sem motivao idnea, diante da pena fixada em 4 anos, da fixabase no mimo legal e da primariedade, em conformidade com as Su

Court Disposition

Ordem concedida para determinar a imediata inserInser...

Orders

Determinar a imediata inseru no regime aberto.
Publique-se e intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.