HC 884431 - DECISAO

A ordem foi denegada porque o Tribunal de origem apresentou fundamentação concreta (gravidade concreta da conduta, uso ostensivo de simulacro de arma, concurso de agentes, circunstâncias e periculosidade) que autorizou a fixação do regime inicial fechado mesmo com pena-base no mínimo legal.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Impetrante / Paciente: PEDRO HENRIQUE FELICIANO DA SILVA LIMA; Órgão Recorrido: Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo; Manifestante / Fiscal Da Lei: Ministério Público Federal
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 29 February 2024
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Decisão Denegatória
Outcome: denego a ordem de habeas corpus.
Legal Topics: Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena, Súmula 440/stj, Súmulas 718 E 719/stf, Habeas Corpus

Direito Penal Processo Penal Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena Súmula 440/stj Súmulas 718 E 719/stf Habeas Corpus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

PEDRO HENRIQUE FELICIANO DA SILVA LIMA

Impetrante / Paciente

Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo

Órgão Recorrido

Ministério Público Federal

Manifestante / Fiscal Da Lei

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Decisão Denegatória

Legal Issues

1 Possibilidade de fixação de regime inicial mais gravoso apesar da pena-base no mínimo legal
2 Aplicação das Súmulas 440/STJ e 718/719/STF
3 Necessidade de fundamentação concreta para imposição de regime mais severo

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

denego a ordem de habeas corpus.

Orders

Publique-se.
Intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.