HC 1043112 - DECISAO

Não se constatou ilegalidade manifesta no acórdão impugnado; o Tribunal de Justiça apresentou motivação idônea para a fixação do regime inicial fechado com base na gravidade concreta do crime, no emprego de arma de fogo e no concurso de agentes, razão pela qual o Habeas Corpus não foi conhecido/foi indeferido...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: JONAS DA SILVA OLIVEIRA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 22 October 2025
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Liminar Indeferida
Outcome: Habeas Corpus indeferido liminarmente
Legal Topics: Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena, Individualização Da Pena, Uso De Arma De Fogo, Roubo Majorado, Constrangimento Ilegal

Direito Penal Processo Penal Habeas Corpus Regime Inicial De Cumprimento De Pena Individualização Da Pena Uso De Arma De Fogo Roubo Majorado Constrangimento Ilegal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

JONAS DA SILVA OLIVEIRA

Paciente

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Liminar Indeferida

Legal Issues

1 possibilidade de Habeas Corpus substitutivo de recurso próprio
2 suficiência da fundamentação para imposição de regime fechado
3 necessidade de elementos concretos (gravidade concreta) para agravamento do regime

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Habeas Corpus indeferido liminarmente

Orders

Indefiro liminarmente o Habeas Corpus
Cientifique-se o Ministério Público Federal

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.