HC 1011331 - DECISAO

Por se tratar de pedido idêntico a habeas corpus anteriormente decidido (HC n. 972.037/SP), o writ não pode prosseguir nos termos do art. 210 do RISTJ, razão pela qual a petição inicial foi indeferida liminarmente.

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 23 June 2025
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Petição Inicial Indeferida Liminarmente
Outcome: Petição inicial indeferida liminarmente; habeas corpus inadmissível por mera reiteração de pedido.
Legal Topics: Reiteração De Pedido, Inadmissibilidade

Habeas Corpus Reiteração De Pedido Inadmissibilidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Petição Inicial Indeferida Liminarmente

Legal Issues

1 Reiteração de pedido idêntico a habeas corpus previamente decidido (HC n. 972.037/SP)
2 Aplicação do art. 210 do RISTJ para indeferimento

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Petição inicial indeferida liminarmente; habeas corpus inadmissível por mera reiteração de pedido.

Orders

Indeferida liminarmente a petição inicial.
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.