EAREsp 849607 - ACORDAO

ACÓRDÃO Vistos e relatados estes autos em que são partes as acima indicadas, acordam os Ministros da CORTE ESPECIAL do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, por unanimidade, negar provimento ao recurso, nos termos do voto do Sr. Ministro Relator. Os Srs. Ministros Francisco Falcão, Nancy Andrighi, Laurita Vaz, João Otávio...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LYGIA DE ANDRADE MATZENBACHER
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 12 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno / Decisão Colegiada (corte Especial)
Legal Topics: Repercussão Geral, Pressupostos De Admissibilidade, Fundamentação Das Decisões, Prescrição/preclusão, Súmula 7/stj

Processo Civil Direito Constitucional Repercussão Geral Pressupostos De Admissibilidade Fundamentação Das Decisões Prescrição/preclusão Súmula 7/stj

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

LYGIA DE ANDRADE MATZENBACHER

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno / Decisão Colegiada (corte Especial)

Legal Issues

1 falta de fundamentação do acórdão recorrido (Tema 339/STF)
2 preenchimento dos pressupostos de admissibilidade recursal (Tema 181/STF)
3 prescrição/preclusão das parcelas devidas

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.