AREsp 1809225 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de recurso extraordinário interposto por RAIMUNDO RENATO MAGALHAES DE COUTO, com fundamento no art. 102, inciso III, alínea "a", da Constituição Federal, contra acórdão deste Superior Tribunal de Justiça, assim ementado (e-STJ fl. 458): AGRAVO REGIMENTAL NO AGRAVO EM RECURSO ESPECIAL....

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: RAIMUNDO RENATO MAGALHAES DE COUTO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 10 December 2021
Procedural Posture: Recurso Extraordinário / Seguimento Negado
Legal Topics: Repercussão Geral, Pressupostos De Admissibilidade, Intempestividade, Prazo Em Dobro, Núcleo De Prática Jurídica

Direito Constitucional Processo Penal Processo Civil Repercussão Geral Pressupostos De Admissibilidade Intempestividade Prazo Em Dobro Núcleo De Prática Jurídica

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

RAIMUNDO RENATO MAGALHAES DE COUTO

Recorrente

Procedural Posture

Recurso Extraordinário / Seguimento Negado

Legal Issues

1 existência de repercussão geral da matéria debatida
2 alegada afronta ao art. 5º, caput, da Constituição Federal
3 intempestividade do agravo em recurso especial

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.