AREsp 1307630 - ACORDAO

ACÓRDÃO Vistos e relatados estes autos em que são partes as acima indicadas, acordam os Ministros da TERCEIRA TURMA do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, por unanimidade, negar provimento ao recurso, nos termos do voto do Sr. Ministro Relator. Os Srs. Ministros Nancy Andrighi, Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino, Ricardo Villas...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Autor: RICARDO DOS REIS - ESPÓLIO e outros; Agravante/recorrente: CELSO FRANCISCO (CELSO)
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 19 August 2021
Procedural Posture: Ação De Rompimento Contratual Cumulada Com Reintegração De Posse / Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial (terceira Turma) Julgamento De Recurso
Legal Topics: Rescisão Contratual, Reintegração De Posse, Usucapião, Cerceamento De Defesa, Fundamentação Judicial, Reexame De Provas, Súmulas E Precedentes

Processual Civil Direito Civil Rescisão Contratual Reintegração De Posse Usucapião Cerceamento De Defesa Fundamentação Judicial Reexame De Provas +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

RICARDO DOS REIS - ESPÓLIO e outros

Autor

CELSO FRANCISCO (CELSO)

Agravante/recorrente

Procedural Posture

Ação De Rompimento Contratual Cumulada Com Reintegração De Posse / Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial (terceira Turma) Julgamento De Recurso

Legal Issues

1 Negativa de prestação jurisdicional (art. 535 CPC/73)
2 Cerceamento de defesa por indeferimento de prova oral
3 Legitimidade ativa dos autores

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.