HC 1063178 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Cuida-se de Habeas Corpus com pedido de liminar impetrado em favor de CLAYTON LEAO NUNES, no qual se aponta como ato coator a decisão monocrática de Desembargador do TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO que indeferiu o pedido de liminar formulado no HC n. 2397711-24.2025.8.26.000. Consta dos autos que...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: CLAYTON LEAO NUNES; Coator (decisão Monocrática Que Indeferiu Liminar): Desembargador do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 29 December 2025
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Pedido De Liminar Impetrado No STJ Contra Indeferimento De Liminar Pelo Relator No Tribunal De Origem; Liminar Indeferida No STJ
Legal Topics: Saída Temporária, Súmula 691/stf, Liminar

Execução Penal Processo Penal Habeas Corpus Saída Temporária Súmula 691/stf Liminar

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

CLAYTON LEAO NUNES

Paciente

Desembargador do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo

Coator (decisão Monocrática Que Indeferiu Liminar)

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Pedido De Liminar Impetrado No STJ Contra Indeferimento De Liminar Pelo Relator No Tribunal De Origem; Liminar Indeferida No STJ

Legal Issues

1 cabimento de habeas corpus no STJ contra decisão monocrática de indeferimento de liminar proferida em tribunal de origem
2 aplicabilidade da Súmula n. 691 do STF
3 verificação de flagrante ilegalidade ou teratologia para superar a Súmula 691

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.