AREsp 831758 - DECISAO

Considerando o julgamento do Agravo de fls. 1637/1677e, resta prejudicado o Agravo Interno de fls. 1897/1906e.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ALCEBIADES GOMES DE CAMPOS E OUTROS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 22 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno / Decisão
Outcome: Agravo Interno prejudicado.
Legal Topics: Suspensão Do Processo, Prejudicialidade

Processo Civil Suspensão Do Processo Prejudicialidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1

Parties

ALCEBIADES GOMES DE CAMPOS E OUTROS

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno / Decisão

Legal Issues

1 suspensão do processo
2 prejudicialidade do agravo interno
3 efeito do julgamento de agravo anterior

Ratio Decidendi

Considerando o julgamento do Agravo de fls. 1637/1677e, resta prejudicado o Agravo Interno de fls. 1897/1906e.

Court Disposition

Agravo Interno prejudicado.

Orders

Prejudicado o Agravo Interno de fls. 1897/1906e.
Publique-se e intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.