TutCautAnt 277 - DECISAO

O agravo em recurso especial (AREsp 2.569.400/MS) foi julgado pela Quarta Turma, tendo sido decidido o processo principal; assim, a tutela provisória vinculada perdeu seu objeto e os embargos de declaração opostos às fls. 107-138 ficam prejudicados, nos termos do art. 34, XI, do RISTJ.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Requerente: MARIETA PEREIRA DE SOUZA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 04 November 2024
Procedural Posture: Pedido De Tutela Provisória Vinculado a Recurso Especial / Pedido Prejudicado Após Julgamento Do Processo Principal
Outcome: Julgo prejudicados os embargos de declaração opostos às fls. 107-138.
Legal Topics: Tutela Provisória, Efeito Suspensivo, Embargos De Declaração, Prejudicialidade

Processo Civil Tutela Provisória Efeito Suspensivo Embargos De Declaração Prejudicialidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1

Parties

MARIETA PEREIRA DE SOUZA

Requerente

Procedural Posture

Pedido De Tutela Provisória Vinculado a Recurso Especial / Pedido Prejudicado Após Julgamento Do Processo Principal

Legal Issues

1 concessão de efeito suspensivo ao recurso especial
2 perda de objeto da tutela provisória após julgamento do processo principal
3 prejudicialidade dos embargos de declaração

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Julgo prejudicados os embargos de declaração opostos às fls. 107-138.

Orders

Julgo prejudicados os embargos de declaração opostos às fls. 107-138.
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.