HC 1093944 - DECISAO

Por haver recurso especial pendente contra o mesmo acórdão, aplica-se o princípio da unirrecorribilidade, tornando inadmissível a impetração simultânea de habeas corpus e recurso especial; assim, indefere-se liminarmente o habeas corpus.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: JHONATAN COUTINHO THOMAZ; Impetrado: TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DO ESPÍRITO SANTO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 07 May 2026
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Liminar Indeferida
Outcome: liminar indeferida
Legal Topics: Unirrecorribilidade, Habeas Corpus, Provas Informativas/inquisitoriais, Art. 155 Do CPP, Dosimetria, Bis in Idem, Participação De Menor Importância, Recurso Especial Pendente

Direito Processual Penal Direito Penal Unirrecorribilidade Habeas Corpus Provas Informativas/inquisitoriais Art. 155 Do CPP Dosimetria Bis in Idem +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

JHONATAN COUTINHO THOMAZ

Paciente

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DO ESPÍRITO SANTO

Impetrado

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Liminar Indeferida

Legal Issues

1 Admissibilidade de habeas corpus com recurso especial pendente (princípio da unirrecorribilidade)
2 Alegação de valoração exclusiva de elementos informativos colhidos na fase inquisitorial (art. 155 do CPP)
3 Alegação de nulidade na dosimetria e bis in idem

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

liminar indeferida

Orders

Indefiro liminarmente o habeas corpus.
Comunique-se o Ministério Público Federal.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.