MA8-12456
The claimant failed to produce clear and convincing evidence that Hungarian state protection was unavailable or ineffective; her single police report was recorded and there exist statutory, judicial and NGO remedies for Roma in Hungary; alleged discrimination did not amount to persecution; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MA8-12456
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Adjudicator: Me Mélanie Raymond; Tribunal Officer: Annie Lemaine
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection / Decision
- Outcome
- Refugee protection claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, State Protection Adequacy, Membership of a Particular Social Group (roma), Burden and Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Me Mélanie Raymond
Adjudicator
Annie Lemaine
Tribunal Officer
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee under section 96 of IRPA
- 2 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection under subsection 97(1) of IRPA
- 3 Whether state protection in Hungary is adequate and accessible
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to produce clear and convincing evidence that Hungarian state protection was unavailable or ineffective; her single police report was recorded and there exist statutory, judicial and NGO remedies for Roma in Hungary; alleged discrimination did not amount to persecution; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Refugee protection claim rejected
Orders
- Refugee protection claim rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment