Canada Judgment

Refugee Protection Division

MA4-06166

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

01

Holding and result

The tribunal granted the postponement because the Minister identified potentially important new information from US authorities that could cause an injustice if the hearing proceeded without it; on balance of factors under rule 48 the need to assess and disclose that information outweighed the prejudice of delay, subject to limits and conditions (inform by end of December, submit document list, and fixed peremptory hearing dates).

Court disposition

Request for postponement allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Postponement of hearings scheduled for December 5 and 7, 2006
  • Minister to inform the tribunal before the end of December of the nature of the new information and of his intentions regarding its disclosure
  • Minister to submit as soon as possible a detailed list of documents contained in the claimant's immigration file
  • Two full days for hearing to be scheduled between March 19 and April 14, 2007
  • Hearings are peremptory
  • Tribunal clarifies that this delay is not an additional three month delay to the Minister

02

Material facts

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant Counsel: Me Mitchell Goldberg

Claude Léveillé

Minister's Representative / Minister's Counsel Counsel: Claude Léveillé

Normand Leduc

Refugee Protection Officer

Jeannine Beaubien-Duque

Decision Maker / Panel

Amounts and remedies

  • Previous Delay Months: 3.5
  • Hearing Days Scheduled: 2
  • Number of Postponement Requests Mentioned: 6

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Refugee Protection Postponement Request / Decision on Request for Postponement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Minister's representative requested a postponement because he had been unable to complete evaluation of a security report received around August 2006 due to other partners' failure to comply with a prior delay and was awaiting an important package from the Canadian Embassy in Washington which he considered necessary to evaluate.
Respondent
The tribunal (and implicitly the claimant) stressed the need for disclosure and timely proceedings; the tribunal accepted the possibility the material could be important but required the Minister to inform the tribunal by the end of December and to submit a detailed list of documents, limited the extent of delay and scheduled peremptory hearing dates.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Refugee Protection Division Rules, s.48(4)(e) and s.48(4)(k)

    Discretion to grant or deny postponements must be exercised under the RPD rules balancing prejudice and fairness

  2. 02

    Administrative law principles of procedural fairness / fundamental justice

    Obligation to disclose material evidence and to ensure procedural fairness to avoid injustice

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The tribunal granted the postponement because the Minister identified potentially important new information from US authorities that could cause an injustice if the hearing proceeded without it; on balance of factors under rule 48 the need to assess and disclose that information outweighed the prejudice of delay, subject to limits and conditions (inform by end of December, submit document list, and fixed peremptory hearing dates).

Obiter and limits

  • This delay is not an additional three month delay granted to the Minister
  • The tribunal emphasized that the hearings are peremptory
  • The Minister must submit a detailed list of documents from the claimant's immigration file for tribunal consideration

Court disposition

Request for postponement allowed with conditions

  • Postponement of hearings scheduled for December 5 and 7, 2006
  • Minister to inform the tribunal before the end of December of the nature of the new information and of his intentions regarding its disclosure
  • Minister to submit as soon as possible a detailed list of documents contained in the claimant's immigration file
  • Two full days for hearing to be scheduled between March 19 and April 14, 2007
  • Hearings are peremptory
  • Tribunal clarifies that this delay is not an additional three month delay to the Minister

Source and reliance status

Refugee Protection Division · 14 December 2006

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Refugee Protection Division

Judgment· 14 December 2006

MA4-06166

Immigration and Refugee Board Refugee Protection Division Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié Section de la protection des réfugiés RPD File # / No. dossier SPR : MA4-06166 Private Proceeding Huis clos Claimant(s) Demandeur(e)s d'asile

XXXXX XXXXX Date(s) of Hearing Date(s) de l'audience October 19th, 2004 / August 24th, 2006 Place of Hearing Lieu de l'audience Montréal, Québec Date of decision Date de la décision December 14th, 2006 Panel Tribunal Jeannine Beaubien-Duque Claimant's Counsel Conseil du demandeur d'asile Me Mitchell Goldberg Refugee Protection Officer Agent de la protection des réfugiés Normand Leduc Designated representative Représentant désigné N/A Minister's Counsel Conseil du ministre Claude Léveillee You can obtain the translation of these reasons for decision in the other official language by writing to the Editing and Translation Services Directorate of the IRB at the following address: 344 Slater Street, 14th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K1, by e-mail to translation@irb.gc.ca or by facsimile at (613) 947-3213. La Direction des services de révision et de traduction de la CISR peut vous procurer les présents motifs de décision dans l'autre langue officielle. Vous n'avez qu'à en faire la demande par écrit à l'adresse suivante : 344, rue Slater, 14e étage, Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0K1, par courriel à traduction@cisr.gc.ca ou par télécopie au (613) 947-3213.

REQUEST Request by the Minister's representative, Mr.Claude Léveillé, for a postponement of the hearings in the case of XXXXX XXXXX, MA4-06166 scheduled for December 5th, and 7th, 2006, in Montreal.

DECISION The request was granted in accordance with section 48 of the Refugee Protection Division rules, in particular subsections (4) (e) and (4) (k).

REASONS On December 1st last, the tribunal received a request by the Minister's representative to postpone the above mentioned hearings. Mr. Léveillé based his request on several issues. He submits that he was unable to complete the evaluation of the security report he received in or around August 2006 because of the failure of other partners whose assistance was needed to comply with the three and one half month delay granted by the tribunal in August. Also, Mr. Léveillé submits that an important package had recently been sent by the Canadian Embassy in Washington but not yet delivered to his office. The tribunal understands that the Minister's representative considered it was necessary for him to evaluate this new information but lacked time to do so prior to the up-coming December 5th hearing. It is hoped that this additional delay will enable him to disclose said information as soon as possible so as to allow all parties to better understand the motives behind the sixth request for a postponement on his part. The tribunal believes that the information could be important and that an injustice could be caused by proceeding without it. At this time, and given the nature and complexity of the matter to be heard, this factor outweighs the other factors to be considered in rule 48. The tribunal, therefore, requests that the Minister inform the tribunal before the end of December

of the nature of this new information and of his intentions regarding its disclosure. The tribunal would also like to reiterate that, in compliance with the previous decision issued on November 30th last, the Minister is to submit as soon as possible a detailed list of documents contained in the claimant's immigration file for the consideration of the tribunal, in order to enable the tribunal to review it and establish which documents are necessary before making a provisional order of disclosure. The tribunal would like to emphasize the fact that this delay is not an additional three month delay granted to the Minister. It is granted to allow sufficient time to receive the above mentioned package from the Canadian authorities in the U.S. and to assess its contents. Due to my own calendar of hearings across Canada in the up-coming months, it would have been impossible for me to reschedule a new hearing before the 19th of March, 2007. The tribunal, therefore, orders that two full days be scheduled between March 19th and April 14th for the hearing of this case. The hearings are peremptory. Jeannine Beaubien-Duque Jeannine Beaubien-Duque December 14th, 2006 Date /gl REFUGEE PROTECTION DIVISION / APPLICATION / POSTPONEMENT / MINISTER / PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS / NEW EVIDENCE / FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE / MALE / ALLOWED / UZBEKISTAN RPD File # / No. dossier SPR : MA4-06166 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Refugee Protection Division Rules, section 48, subsections (4)(e) and (4)(k)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.