TB9-19007
The RPD erred by dismissing the psychological assessment and treating the PA's failure to recall an ex-partner's last name as fatal to her claim; on balance of probabilities the PA proved she is bisexual and, because bisexuality is persecuted in Nigeria and state protection/IFA are unavailable, she faces a serious possibility of persecution. The minor male Appellant shares nexus as a family member and also faces a serious possibility of persecution. The minor female Appellant, being a U.S. citizen, was not shown to be at risk on return to the United States.
- Citation
- TB9-19007
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Minor Appellant (male): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Minor Appellant (female): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Decision (reasons)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; RPD determination set aside in part and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Orientation, Persecution, Particular Social Group, Female Genital Mutilation, Internal Flight Alternative
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Minor Appellant (male)
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Minor Appellant (female)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Decision (reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Principal Appellant proved she is bisexual
- 2 Whether the Principal Appellant faces a serious possibility of persecution in Nigeria on account of her sexuality
- 3 Whether the minor male Appellant has nexus as a member of a particular social group and faces persecution
Ratio Decidendi
The RPD erred by dismissing the psychological assessment and treating the PA's failure to recall an ex-partner's last name as fatal to her claim; on balance of probabilities the PA proved she is bisexual and, because bisexuality is persecuted in Nigeria and state protection/IFA are unavailable, she faces a serious possibility of persecution. The minor male Appellant shares nexus as a family member and also faces a serious possibility of persecution. The minor female Appellant, being a U.S. citizen, was not shown to be at risk on return to the United States.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; RPD determination set aside in part and substituted
Orders
- Set aside the RPD determination and substitute a determination that the Principal Appellant is a Convention refugee pursuant to IRPA
- Set aside the RPD determination and substitute a determination that the minor male Appellant is a Convention refugee pursuant to IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment