Duane v. The Queen
- Citation
- [1985] 2 SCR 612
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 18 December 1985
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 18 December 1985
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The offence under s.408 does not require proof of an intention to use counterfeit money as currency; on the facts the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s.408, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Rita Rae Duane
Appellant Counsel: Alain HepnerHer Majesty The Queen
Respondent Counsel: B. W. Duncan03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether intention to use counterfeit money as currency is an element of the offence under s.408 of the Criminal Code
- 02
Whether the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s.408 on the facts
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that proof of an intention to use the counterfeit money as currency was required for conviction and that such intention was absent.
- Respondent
- The Crown argued that intention to use the counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence and that possession under s.408 was established on the facts.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 408; Supreme Court of Canada (Duane v. The Queen)
Intention to use counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence under s.408 of the Criminal Code.
- 02
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 408; Supreme Court of Canada (Duane v. The Queen)
Possession within the meaning of s.408 can be established on the factual circumstances of the case without proof of intent to circulate.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The offence under s.408 does not require proof of an intention to use counterfeit money as currency; on the facts the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s.408, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed
- Appeal dismissed
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of Canada · 18 December 1985
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of Canada
Judgment· 18 December 1985
Duane v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1985-12-18 Report [1985] 2 SCR 612 Case number 18719 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 18719 Decision Content Duane v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 612 Rita Rae Duane Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 18719. 1985: December 18. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer Wilson and Le Dain JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law ‑‑ Possession of counterfeit money ‑‑ Elements of offense ‑‑ Whether intention to use the counterfeit money as currency an element of the offence ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s.
408. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s.
408. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (1984), 12 C.C.C. (3d) 368, allowing the Crown's appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of possession of counterfeit money. Appeal dismissed. Alain Hepner, for the appellant. B. W. Duncan, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑We agree with the majority of the Court of Appeal that intention to use the counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence and that on the facts of this case the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s. 408 of the Criminal Code . The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: MacPherson & Associates, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: Attorney General for Alberta, Edmonton.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.