Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of Canada

Duane v. The Queen

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offence under s.408 does not require proof of an intention to use counterfeit money as currency; on the facts the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s.408, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Rita Rae Duane

Appellant Counsel: Alain Hepner

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent Counsel: B. W. Duncan

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that proof of an intention to use the counterfeit money as currency was required for conviction and that such intention was absent.
Respondent
The Crown argued that intention to use the counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence and that possession under s.408 was established on the facts.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 408; Supreme Court of Canada (Duane v. The Queen)

    Intention to use counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence under s.408 of the Criminal Code.

  2. 02

    Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 408; Supreme Court of Canada (Duane v. The Queen)

    Possession within the meaning of s.408 can be established on the factual circumstances of the case without proof of intent to circulate.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offence under s.408 does not require proof of an intention to use counterfeit money as currency; on the facts the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s.408, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

  • Appeal dismissed

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of Canada · 18 December 1985

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of Canada

Judgment· 18 December 1985

[1985] 2 SCR 612

Duane v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1985-12-18 Report [1985] 2 SCR 612 Case number 18719 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 18719 Decision Content Duane v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 612 Rita Rae Duane Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 18719. 1985: December 18. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer Wilson and Le Dain JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law ‑‑ Possession of counterfeit money ‑‑ Elements of offense ‑‑ Whether intention to use the counterfeit money as currency an element of the offence ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s.

408. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s.

408. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (1984), 12 C.C.C. (3d) 368, allowing the Crown's appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of possession of counterfeit money. Appeal dismissed. Alain Hepner, for the appellant. B. W. Duncan, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑We agree with the majority of the Court of Appeal that intention to use the counterfeit money as currency is not an element of the offence and that on the facts of this case the appellant was in possession within the meaning of s. 408 of the Criminal Code . The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: MacPherson & Associates, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: Attorney General for Alberta, Edmonton.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Duane v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 612

Case cited

Alberta Court of Appeal decision (1984), 12 C.C.C. (3d) 368

Case cited

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 408

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.