Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional-law

R. v. R.B.-C.

The Supreme Court held that post-verdict sentencing delay is assessed under a “markedly longer” test, not a fixed ceiling, and upheld a sentence reduction remedy.

  • Charter-s.-11(b)-reasonable-time
  • Post-verdict-sentencing-delay
  • Remedy-for-constitutional-breach
  • Sentencing-delay
  • Charter-s-11b-reasonable-time
  • Sentencing-remedies
Read case analysis
Criminal-law

R. v. Berg

A sexual assault conviction was upheld. The Court said R. v. J.J.R.D. is about appellate review of reasons, not a trial formula for W. (D.) analysis.

  • Assessment-of-credibility
  • Consent-in-sexual-assault
  • W.-(d.)-analysis
  • Appellate-review-of-sufficiency-of-reasons
  • Criminal-law
  • Evidence
Read case analysis
Constitutional-law

R. v. Jacques-Taylor

The Supreme Court held that delay caused by a co-accused’s counsel in a joint trial can be a discrete exceptional circumstance under s. 11(b), so the stay was set aside.

  • Charter-right-to-be-tried-within-reasonable-time
  • Jordan-framework
  • Exceptional-circumstances
  • Joint-trials
  • Defence-delay
  • Case-management
Read case analysis
Constitutional-law

R. v. Vrbanic

The Supreme Court allowed the Crown’s appeal, set aside a stay under s. 11(b) of the Charter, and held the project prosecution was particularly complex.

  • Charter-right-to-be-tried-within-a-reasonable-time
  • S.-11(b)-delay
  • Jordan-framework
  • Case-complexity-exception
  • Stay-of-proceedings
  • Charter-right-to-trial-within-reasonable-time
Read case analysis
Criminal-law

R. v. Saddleback

The Supreme Court dismissed the Crown’s appeal in a second-degree murder case, holding the trial judge relied on an out-of-court statement as hearsay and that no curative proviso applied.

  • Hearsay
  • Sufficiency-of-reasons
  • Material-misapprehension-of-evidence
  • Curative-proviso
  • Second-degree-murder
  • Criminal-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal-law

R. v. Whitehawk

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal in R. v. Whitehawk, agreeing substantially with the majority reasons of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

  • Appeal
  • Dismissal-of-appeal
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal-law

R. v. Burke-Whittaker

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the respondent’s motion to adduce new evidence and dismissed the appeal. Reasons were to follow.

  • Motion-to-adduce-new-evidence
  • Appeal-dismissal
  • Criminal-law
  • Appellate-practice
  • New-evidence
  • Appeal-dismissed
Read case analysis
Criminal-law 2026 ONCA 349

R. v. Khodayar

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal in R. v. Khodayar, holding that Schertzer governed and that s. 13 did not protect the transcripts.

  • Section-13-canadian-charter-testimonial-self-incrimination
  • Obstruction-of-justice-(criminal-code-s.139(2))
  • Admissibility-of-prior-testimony
  • Stare-decisis-(vertical-vs-horizontal)
  • Section-13-charter
  • Obstruction-of-justice
Read case analysis
Criminal-law 2026 ONCA 346

R. v. M.T.

On sentence appeal in a sexual interference case, the Court upheld the 17-month custodial term but varied an overbroad s. 161(1) order.

  • Sentencing-principles
  • Restraint-for-youthful-offenders
  • Gladue-factors
  • Geographic-and-non-contact-orders
  • Appellate-review-of-sentence
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal-law 2026 ONCA 345

R. v. Nygard

The Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld Peter Nygard’s convictions and 11-year sentence, finding the expert-evidence error harmless, similar-fact use proper, and fresh sentencing evidence unhelpful.

  • Expert-evidence-(neurobiology-of-trauma)
  • Similar-fact-evidence-(cross-count-use)
  • Curative-proviso-s.686(1)(b)(iii)
  • Fresh-evidence-on-sentencing
  • Publication-ban
  • Criminal-evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.