R. v. Catchpole
- Citation
- 2012 BCSC 2198
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 4 July 2012
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 4 July 2012
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Given the accused's lack of criminal record, absence of aggravating features, and the nature and scale of the operation, the court accepted the joint submission and imposed a 15-month sentence to be served conditionally in the community with specific conditions, ordered statutory ancillary orders (DNA sample, s.109 firearm prohibition for 10 years), ordered forfeiture of listed items, waived the victim fine surcharge, and directed stays of proceedings on specified counts.
Court disposition
Sentence: 15 months imprisonment to be served conditionally in the community (conditional sentence order).
Orders
- Keep the peace and be of good behaviour; appear before the court when required
- Report in person to a conditional sentence supervisor by 4:00 p.m. on July 4, 2012 and thereafter as directed
- Remain within British Columbia unless written permission obtained
- Notify court/supervisor of any change of name, address, or employment
- Provide current residence and phone number and notify supervisor before any change
- Obey a curfew inside residence from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. daily except with written consent of supervisor for specified reasons
- Answer door and phone for compliance checks by supervisor or peace officer
- Attend school or seek/maintain employment as approved by supervisor (continue business full-time)
- Do not possess or consume alcohol or controlled substances except as prescribed by a physician; do not enter liquor retail or licensed premises
- Do not possess pipes, syringes, or other drug paraphernalia
- Do not possess any weapon as defined in s.2 of the Criminal Code
- Complete 50 hours of community service under supervisor direction no later than April 30, 2013
- Provide a DNA sample at direction of conditional sentence supervisor pursuant to ss.487.04 and 487.05(1)
- Prohibition on possession of firearms, ammunition, or explosives for 10 years under s.109 of the Criminal Code
- Forfeiture of items listed in the consented forfeiture order to Her Majesty the Queen to be disposed of by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services
- Victim fine surcharge waived
- Stay of proceedings entered: for Mr. Szabo on Counts 3 and 4; for Richard Catchpole on Count 4
02
Material facts
Parties
Regina
Prosecution Counsel: R. FowlerDarren George Catchpole
AccusedRichard Andrew Catchpole
Accused Counsel: C. JohnsonLloyd Sandor Szabo
Accused Counsel: C. TollefsonAmounts and remedies
- Mature Plants: 90
- Clones: 181
- Harvested Marihuana Kg Approx: kg 30
- Sentence Months: 15
- Community Service Hours: 50
- Accused Age: 50
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether a conditional sentence is appropriate versus an actual custodial sentence for participation in a marihuana grow operation
- 02
Appropriate ancillary orders (forfeiture, DNA sample, firearm prohibition)
- 03
Whether victim fine surcharge should be imposed
- 04
Application of stay of proceedings on specified counts
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Defense (joint submission) argued that a conditional sentence order is appropriate given the accused's lack of criminal record, family and employment ties, absence of aggravating features (no weapons or hydro theft), and the relatively small, non-violent, sophisticated grow operation.
- Respondent
- Crown agreed with the joint submission and sought the ancillary orders recorded by the court including DNA sample, forfeiture of listed items, a firearm prohibition under s.109, and consented to stays of proceedings on specified counts; Crown did not press for victim fine surcharge.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Code (sentencing principles)
Sentencing must reflect principles of proportionality, restraint and rehabilitation; a conditional sentence may be imposed where custody is not necessary
- 02
Criminal Code, ss.487.04 and 487.05(1)
DNA samples may be required under statutory scheme for identification
- 03
Criminal Code, s.109
Prohibition on possession of firearms may be imposed as part of sentence pursuant to section 109
- 04
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, s.2
Definitions of controlled substances and related prohibitions are governed by the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
- 05
Forfeiture order consented and filed as exhibit
Property linked to criminal activity may be forfeited by order of the court
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Given the accused's lack of criminal record, absence of aggravating features, and the nature and scale of the operation, the court accepted the joint submission and imposed a 15-month sentence to be served conditionally in the community with specific conditions, ordered statutory ancillary orders (DNA sample, s.109 firearm prohibition for 10 years), ordered forfeiture of listed items, waived the victim fine surcharge, and directed stays of proceedings on specified counts.
Obiter and limits
- Operation was relatively sophisticated but small, located in a residence and outbuildings on Humpback Road
- Quantities observed: approximately 90 mature plants, 181 clones, and about 30 kilograms of harvested marihuana (some brought from another location)
- Accused was 50 years old, married with two children, with steady self-employment and no prior record
- No weapons or hydro theft were identified as aggravating features
Court disposition
Sentence: 15 months imprisonment to be served conditionally in the community (conditional sentence order).
- Keep the peace and be of good behaviour; appear before the court when required
- Report in person to a conditional sentence supervisor by 4:00 p.m. on July 4, 2012 and thereafter as directed
- Remain within British Columbia unless written permission obtained
- Notify court/supervisor of any change of name, address, or employment
- Provide current residence and phone number and notify supervisor before any change
- Obey a curfew inside residence from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. daily except with written consent of supervisor for specified reasons
- Answer door and phone for compliance checks by supervisor or peace officer
- Attend school or seek/maintain employment as approved by supervisor (continue business full-time)
- Do not possess or consume alcohol or controlled substances except as prescribed by a physician; do not enter liquor retail or licensed premises
- Do not possess pipes, syringes, or other drug paraphernalia
- Do not possess any weapon as defined in s.2 of the Criminal Code
- Complete 50 hours of community service under supervisor direction no later than April 30, 2013
- Provide a DNA sample at direction of conditional sentence supervisor pursuant to ss.487.04 and 487.05(1)
- Prohibition on possession of firearms, ammunition, or explosives for 10 years under s.109 of the Criminal Code
- Forfeiture of items listed in the consented forfeiture order to Her Majesty the Queen to be disposed of by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services
- Victim fine surcharge waived
- Stay of proceedings entered: for Mr. Szabo on Counts 3 and 4; for Richard Catchpole on Count 4
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of British Columbia · 4 July 2012
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Judgment· 4 July 2012
2012 BCSC 2198 R. v. Catchpole
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Catchpole, 2012 BCSC 2198 Date: 20120704 Docket: 153924-2 Registry: Victoria Regina v. Darren George Catchpole Richard Andrew Catchpole Lloyd Sandor Szabo Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bracken Oral Reasons for Sentence Counsel for the Crown: R. Fowler Counsel for the Accused Richard Catchpole: C. Johnson Counsel for the Accused Lloyd Szabo: C. Tollefson Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Victoria, B.C. July 3 and 4, 2012 Place and Date of Judgment: Victoria, B.C. July 4, 2012 [1] THE COURT: I will just say for the record that this is a marihuana grow operation that was based on a rural property on the western edge of Victoria, on Humpback Road. It appears that a residence with some outbuildings had been purchased by Mr. Catchpole and other members of his family, particularly his parents, and he was responsible for arranging rentals and revenue from the property. He had rented part of the property out to Mr. Szabo, who was a co‑accused in this matter. Crown has indicated a stay of proceedings will be entered at the conclusion of this sentencing. [2] Most of the residence which is located on the property had been given over to marihuana production. It appears, just from the material that was filed by way of exhibits on the voir dire, that it was a reasonably sophisticated, relatively small operation. [3] There were a
number of plants. Mr. Fowler, in his submissions, suggests there were 90 mature plants found and 181 clones, with approximately 30 kilograms in total of harvested marihuana on the property, some of which, perhaps as much as 30 kilograms, had apparently been brought there from another location and were there simply at the time of the search. [4] Mr. Catchpole has no record. He is 50 years old. He is married with two children. He has a good work history. He is currently self-employed and I gather has been for some time. The submission is that he was not the primary owner of the operation, although clearly a participant, and was found on the premises and in the residence at the time of the police search. [5] The proposed joint submission is one which I find to be appropriate, given the lack of record, given the absence of any aggravating features such as any weapons or theft of hydro. The obvious principal proposal for this is that Mr. Catchpole has no criminal record and it appears that there is no need for an actual custodial sentence. I am satisfied that the principles of sentencing can be met with a conditional sentence order. [6] Mr. Catchpole, if you could just stand up for me, please, you will be sentenced to a period of imprisonment for 15 months to be served conditionally in the community on these conditions. [7] You shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour. You must
appear before the court when required to do so by the court. [8] You shall report in person to a conditional sentence supervisor no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 4, 2012, at the probation office at 836 Courtney Street, Victoria, British Columbia, and shall thereafter report as and when directed by your supervisor and in the manner directed by your supervisor. [9] You must remain within British Columbia unless written permission to go outside the jurisdiction is obtained from the court or the supervisor. [10] You shall notify the court or your supervisor in advance of any change of name or address, and promptly notify the court or the supervisor of any change of employment or occupation. [11] You must inform the conditional sentence supervisor of your present residential address and telephone number, and you shall not change your address or phone number at any time without first notifying the supervisor. [12] You must obey a curfew by being inside of your residence between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. each day, except with the written consent of the supervisor, such consent is to be given, however, only for compelling personal, family, or employment reasons; or when travelling directly to or returning directly from your place of employment, or while in the course of such employment, and you must provide your supervisor with written details of your employment if requested
to do so; when travelling directly to or returning directly from an educational institution at which you are enrolled, or while in the course of classes or extracurricular activities approved of by the supervisor. [13] You must present yourself at the door to your residence when the supervisor or any peace officer attends there for the purpose of determining your compliance with the curfew and house arrest conditions of this order. You shall respond personally and immediately to the telephone when a peace officer or the supervisor makes a phone call to your residence for the purpose of determining your compliance with the curfew or house arrest condition of this order. [14] You must attend school regularly and not be absent, except in accordance with either a medical certificate or the advance written consent of the supervisor, or make reasonable efforts to seek and maintain employment approved of by the supervisor. I take it that means you shall continue with your business on a full-time basis, and if there is some problem with that, you must use your best efforts to find employment. [15] You shall not possess or consume any alcohol or controlled substance within the meaning of s. 2 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, except as prescribed for you by a licensed physician. That is, you are serving a jail sentence, you are not to be found in possession or consume any
alcohol. That is a strict condition. You must not enter any liquor store, beer and wine store, bar, pub, lounge, or nightclub. [16] You shall not possess any pipes, syringes, or other drug paraphernalia. [17] You shall not possess any weapon as defined in s. 2 of the Criminal Code. [18] Under the direction and supervision of the supervisor, you shall successfully complete 50 hours of community service work, which shall be completed no later than April 30, 2013. [19] With respect to s. 487.04 and 487.05(1), you must supply a sample of DNA, and that is to be done at the direction of your conditional sentence supervisor, who will direct you to attend at a police detachment or police station for that purpose. [20] Under section, I believe it is s. 109 for this provision? [21] MR. FOWLER: Yes, 109. [22] THE COURT: Section 109, you are prohibited from the possession of any firearm, ammunition, or explosive substance and that is, I believe, a lifetime ban under s. 109 or is that a 10-year ban? [23] MR. JOHNSON: I think it's 10 years. [24] MR. FOWLER: It's 10 year for -- 10 years for a number of the items and there is lifetime ban for other items also specified, but it's -- [25] THE COURT: All right. That will be for 10 years. [26] In addition, there is a forfeiture order which has been consented to and been filed as an exhibit. That sets out the items which will be forfeited, and I
will order the items that are listed in the final paragraph of the forfeiture order, which has been consented to, to be forfeited to Her Majesty The Queen and disposed of as the Minister of Public Works and Government Services directs. [27] MR. JOHNSON: And I'm not making any submission with respect to the victim fine surcharge, so that can -- [28] THE COURT: Any comment on that? [29] MR. FOWLER: No, thank you. [30] THE COURT: I will waive the victim fine surcharge. [31] MR. FOWLER: And My Lord, I will direct now a stay of proceedings with respect to Mr. Szabo on both Counts 3 and 4, and with respect to Richard Catchpole with respect to Count 4, as well. [32] THE COURT: All right. "J. K. Bracken, J." The Honourable Mr. Justice Bracken
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.