Canada Judgment

British Columbia Court of Appeal

R. v. Cote

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Time for filing the notice of application for leave to appeal was extended, leave to appeal was granted, and the appeal was allowed applying R. v. Summers to grant enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit and variation of the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment.

Court disposition

Time extended for leave application; leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment.

Orders

  • Extend time for filing notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014
  • Grant leave to appeal
  • Allow the appeal
  • Vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment
  • Apply enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit

02

Material facts

Parties

Regina

Respondent Counsel: E. Campbell

Donald Denis Cote

Appellant Counsel: C. Darnay

Amounts and remedies

  • Pre Sentence Custody (days): 727
  • Additional Credit Sought/awarded (days): 364
  • Adjusted Sentence (days): 734

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application and Sentence Variation on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought extension of time to apply for leave to appeal and, if leave granted, sought enhanced (1.5:1) credit for one year and 362 days pre-sentence custody based on R. v. Summers, requesting an additional 364 days' credit and reduction of sentence.
Respondent
Crown did not oppose extension of time or enhanced credit and agreed the appellant was not statutorily disqualified from receiving such credit.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26

    A court may grant enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody in accordance with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Summers.

  2. 02

    Court of Appeal practice and reasons in R. v. Cote (2014 BCCA 475)

    Courts have discretion to extend time for filing leave to appeal where circumstances justify extension, including timely pursuit of legal aid.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Time for filing the notice of application for leave to appeal was extended, leave to appeal was granted, and the appeal was allowed applying R. v. Summers to grant enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit and variation of the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment.

Obiter and limits

  • The Crown confirmed the appellant was not statutorily disqualified from receiving enhanced credit.
  • All members of the panel concurred with the order to extend time, grant leave and vary the sentence.

Court disposition

Time extended for leave application; leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment.

  • Extend time for filing notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014
  • Grant leave to appeal
  • Allow the appeal
  • Vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment
  • Apply enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit

Source and reliance status

British Columbia Court of Appeal · 1 December 2014

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Judgment· 1 December 2014

2014 BCCA 475

2014 BCCA 475 R. v. Cote

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Cote, 2014 BCCA 475 Date: 20141201 Docket: CA042110 Between: Regina Respondent And Donald Denis Cote Appellant Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2013 (R. v. Cote, 2013 BCSC 2424, Vancouver Docket 26159). Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: C. Darnay Counsel for the Respondent: E. Campbell Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, British Columbia December 1, 2014 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia December 1, 2014 Summary: Enhanced credit given for pre-sentence custody on the basis of R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26. [1] WILLCOCK J.A.: On October 24, 2013, Donald Cote was sentenced to three years and three days' imprisonment on a charge of manslaughter and two counts of assault with a weapon (one year each concurrent). The sentencing judge granted Mr. Cote 1:1 credit for one year and 362 days spent in pre‑sentence custody. [2] Having sought legal aid funding in a timely manner, Mr. Cote now applies for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal the manslaughter sentence and, if leave is granted, seeks enhanced (i.e., 1.5:1) credit for the one year and 362 days spent in pre‑sentence custody based on the decision of the Supreme

Court of Canada in R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, 308 C.C.C. (3d) 471. [3] He seeks an additional 364 days' credit for time in pre‑trial custody. The Crown is not opposed to time being extended or to enhanced credit being given. It agrees Mr. Cote is not disqualified from receiving such credit for any statutory reason. [4] I would extend the time for filing of the notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014, grant leave to appeal, allow the appeal, and vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment. [5] GROBERMAN J.A.: I agree. [6] HARRIS J.A.: I agree. [7] GROBERMAN J.A.: The time for filing the notice of application for leave is extended to August 25, 2014, leave to appeal is granted, the appeal is allowed, and the sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment. "The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock"

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26

Case cited

R. v. Cote, 2013 BCSC 2424

Case cited

R. v. Cote, 2014 BCCA 475

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.