R. v. Cote
- Citation
- 2014 BCCA 475
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 1 December 2014
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application and Sentence Variation on Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 1 December 2014
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application and Sentence Variation on Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Time for filing the notice of application for leave to appeal was extended, leave to appeal was granted, and the appeal was allowed applying R. v. Summers to grant enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit and variation of the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment.
Court disposition
Time extended for leave application; leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment.
Orders
- Extend time for filing notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014
- Grant leave to appeal
- Allow the appeal
- Vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment
- Apply enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit
02
Material facts
Parties
Regina
Respondent Counsel: E. CampbellDonald Denis Cote
Appellant Counsel: C. DarnayAmounts and remedies
- Pre Sentence Custody (days): 727
- Additional Credit Sought/awarded (days): 364
- Adjusted Sentence (days): 734
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application and Sentence Variation on Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether to extend time for filing notice of application for leave to appeal
- 02
Whether enhanced 1.5:1 credit for pre-sentence custody should be applied under R. v. Summers
- 03
Whether the appellant was disqualified from receiving enhanced credit for any statutory reason
- 04
What sentence variation follows application of enhanced pre-sentence custody credit
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant sought extension of time to apply for leave to appeal and, if leave granted, sought enhanced (1.5:1) credit for one year and 362 days pre-sentence custody based on R. v. Summers, requesting an additional 364 days' credit and reduction of sentence.
- Respondent
- Crown did not oppose extension of time or enhanced credit and agreed the appellant was not statutorily disqualified from receiving such credit.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26
A court may grant enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody in accordance with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Summers.
- 02
Court of Appeal practice and reasons in R. v. Cote (2014 BCCA 475)
Courts have discretion to extend time for filing leave to appeal where circumstances justify extension, including timely pursuit of legal aid.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Time for filing the notice of application for leave to appeal was extended, leave to appeal was granted, and the appeal was allowed applying R. v. Summers to grant enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit and variation of the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment.
Obiter and limits
- The Crown confirmed the appellant was not statutorily disqualified from receiving enhanced credit.
- All members of the panel concurred with the order to extend time, grant leave and vary the sentence.
Court disposition
Time extended for leave application; leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment.
- Extend time for filing notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014
- Grant leave to appeal
- Allow the appeal
- Vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment
- Apply enhanced 1.5:1 credit for 1 year and 362 days pre-sentence custody, resulting in an additional 364 days' credit
Source and reliance status
British Columbia Court of Appeal · 1 December 2014
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Judgment· 1 December 2014
2014 BCCA 475 R. v. Cote
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Cote, 2014 BCCA 475 Date: 20141201 Docket: CA042110 Between: Regina Respondent And Donald Denis Cote Appellant Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2013 (R. v. Cote, 2013 BCSC 2424, Vancouver Docket 26159). Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: C. Darnay Counsel for the Respondent: E. Campbell Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, British Columbia December 1, 2014 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia December 1, 2014 Summary: Enhanced credit given for pre-sentence custody on the basis of R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26. [1] WILLCOCK J.A.: On October 24, 2013, Donald Cote was sentenced to three years and three days' imprisonment on a charge of manslaughter and two counts of assault with a weapon (one year each concurrent). The sentencing judge granted Mr. Cote 1:1 credit for one year and 362 days spent in pre‑sentence custody. [2] Having sought legal aid funding in a timely manner, Mr. Cote now applies for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal the manslaughter sentence and, if leave is granted, seeks enhanced (i.e., 1.5:1) credit for the one year and 362 days spent in pre‑sentence custody based on the decision of the Supreme
Court of Canada in R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, 308 C.C.C. (3d) 471. [3] He seeks an additional 364 days' credit for time in pre‑trial custody. The Crown is not opposed to time being extended or to enhanced credit being given. It agrees Mr. Cote is not disqualified from receiving such credit for any statutory reason. [4] I would extend the time for filing of the notice of application for leave to appeal to August 25, 2014, grant leave to appeal, allow the appeal, and vary the sentence to two years and four days' imprisonment. [5] GROBERMAN J.A.: I agree. [6] HARRIS J.A.: I agree. [7] GROBERMAN J.A.: The time for filing the notice of application for leave is extended to August 25, 2014, leave to appeal is granted, the appeal is allowed, and the sentence varied to two years and four days' imprisonment. "The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock"
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.