R. v. Etherden
- Citation
- 2025 ONCA 675
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Decision
- 26 September 2025
- Posture
- Criminal / Court of Appeal Motion Regarding Publication of Decision Under S.517 (publication Ban)
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Decision
- 26 September 2025
- Posture
- Criminal / Court of Appeal Motion Regarding Publication of Decision Under S.517 (publication Ban)
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Because a s.517 non-publication order lawfully prevents publication of evidence, information and reasons from the bail hearing, the Court of Appeal will withhold publication of its decision while that order remains in effect and will permit access consistent with the ban (registry inspection), posting the decision publicly only once the order ceases to be in force.
Court disposition
Publication of the Court of Appeal decision is withheld pursuant to the s.517 non-publication order; interim access at the Registry permitted; public posting deferred until the order lapses.
Orders
- Decision not to be published, broadcast or transmitted while the s.517 non-publication order remains in effect.
- The decision will be posted on the Court of Appeal for Ontario website once the non-publication order ceases to be in effect.
- A copy of the full decision is available at the Registry of the Court of Appeal for Ontario at 130 Queen Street West, Toronto in the interim.
02
Material facts
Parties
His Majesty the King
Respondent Counsel: Lisa JoyalSommer Elizabeth Etherden
Applicant Counsel: Paul Calarco03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Court of Appeal Motion Regarding Publication of Decision Under S.517 (publication Ban)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Court of Appeal may publish its reasons while a s.517 non-publication order from a bail hearing remains in effect
- 02
What interim access to the full decision is permissible while the publication ban is in force
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant sought release/publication of the Court of Appeal decision or broader access despite the s.517 order.
- Respondent
- The Crown relied on the s.517 non-publication order imposed at the bail hearing and argued the decision cannot be published while that order remains in force.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s.517
A s.517 Criminal Code non-publication order prohibits publication, broadcast or transmission of evidence, information, representations and reasons covered by the order.
- 02
Court of Appeal practice and statutory publication ban regime under s.517 Criminal Code
Appellate courts must respect lower court publication bans and may delay public release of their reasons until such bans lapse; limited access (e.g. registry inspection) may be provided consistent with the ban.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Because a s.517 non-publication order lawfully prevents publication of evidence, information and reasons from the bail hearing, the Court of Appeal will withhold publication of its decision while that order remains in effect and will permit access consistent with the ban (registry inspection), posting the decision publicly only once the order ceases to be in force.
Obiter and limits
- The decision will be posted on the Court of Appeal website once the non-publication order ceases to be in effect.
- An interim copy of the full decision is available for inspection at the Registry of the Court of Appeal for Ontario at 130 Queen Street West, Toronto.
Court disposition
Publication of the Court of Appeal decision is withheld pursuant to the s.517 non-publication order; interim access at the Registry permitted; public posting deferred until the order lapses.
- Decision not to be published, broadcast or transmitted while the s.517 non-publication order remains in effect.
- The decision will be posted on the Court of Appeal for Ontario website once the non-publication order ceases to be in effect.
- A copy of the full decision is available at the Registry of the Court of Appeal for Ontario at 130 Queen Street West, Toronto in the interim.
Source and reliance status
Court of Appeal for Ontario · 26 September 2025
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Judgment· 26 September 2025
R. v. Etherden Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2025-09-26 Neutral citation 2025 ONCA 675 Docket numbers COA-25-OM-0283 Judges Fairburn, J. Michal Subject Criminal Decision Content
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Etherden, 2025 ONCA 675[1] DATE: 20250926 DOCKET: COA-25-OM-0283 Fairburn A.C.J.O. (Motion Judge)
BETWEEN His Majesty the King Respondent and Sommer Elizabeth Etherden Applicant Paul Calarco, for the applicant Lisa Joyal, for the responding party Heard: September 22, 2025 by video conference
REASONS FOR DECISION [1] A non-publication order under s. 517 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, was imposed in this matter at the bail hearing in the court below. That s. 517 order precludes the publication, broadcast, or transmission of any evidence taken, information given, representations made, and reasons given. [2] The decision in R. v. Etherden, 2025 ONCA 675, contains information covered by that order. [3] Accordingly, the decision will be available on the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s website once the non-publication order ceases to be in effect. [4] In the interim, a copy of the full decision is available at the Registry of the Court of Appeal for Ontario at 130 Queen Street West, Toronto. [1] This appeal is subject to a publication ban pursuant to s. 517 of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.