Canada Judgment

British Columbia Court of Appeal

R. v. Fleming

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court concluded the legal question regarding acceptance of out-of-province sureties raises a matter fit for appellate consideration and accordingly directed a review of the BC Supreme Court order under s.680(1) of the Criminal Code.

Court disposition

Application granted; review of the BC Supreme Court order directed under s.680(1) Criminal Code

Orders

  • Direction that the order of the British Columbia Supreme Court pronounced 2 February 2007 be reviewed by the Court of Appeal pursuant to s.680(1) of the Criminal Code

02

Material facts

Parties

Guy William Fleming

Appellant Counsel: Glenn A. Hubbard

Regina

Respondent Counsel: W. Paul Riley

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Application for Review Under S.680(1) Criminal Code; Review Directed

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant sought a direction that the BC Supreme Court order affirming a justice of the peace's refusal to accept an out-of-province surety be reviewed and argued the legal issue should be considered by the Court of Appeal because the refusal prevented compliance with previously ordered bail conditions.
Respondent
Respondent maintained the justice of the peace's refusal was correct in law and that the Supreme Court properly affirmed that refusal, opposing further intervention by the Court of Appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Code, s.680(1)

    Appellate review of interlocutory release orders is available under s.680(1) of the Criminal Code

  2. 02

    Criminal Code and case law

    Justices of the peace have authority to set and accept conditions for judicial interim release, including evaluating sureties, subject to legal limits

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court concluded the legal question regarding acceptance of out-of-province sureties raises a matter fit for appellate consideration and accordingly directed a review of the BC Supreme Court order under s.680(1) of the Criminal Code.

Court disposition

Application granted; review of the BC Supreme Court order directed under s.680(1) Criminal Code

  • Direction that the order of the British Columbia Supreme Court pronounced 2 February 2007 be reviewed by the Court of Appeal pursuant to s.680(1) of the Criminal Code

Source and reliance status

British Columbia Court of Appeal · 26 March 2007

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Judgment· 26 March 2007

2007 BCCA 177

2007 BCCA 177 R. v. Fleming

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Fleming, 2007 BCCA 177 Date: 20070326 Docket: CA034859 Between: Regina Respondent And Guy William Fleming Appellant Before: The Honourable Chief Justice Finch (In Chambers) Glenn A. Hubbard Counsel for the Appellant W. Paul Riley Counsel for the Respondent Written Submissions Received: March 5 and 12, 2007 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia March 26, 2007 Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Chief Justice Finch: [1] The appellant applies pursuant to s. 680(1) of the Criminal Code for a direction that the order of the British Columbia Supreme Court pronounced 2 February 2007 be reviewed by this court. That order affirmed as correct in law the refusal of a justice of the peace to accept an out of province surety as a condition to an order for the appellant's judicial interim release. Without that surety, the appellant is unable to meet the requirements for bail as previously ordered by the Supreme Court on 11 January 2007. [2] In my opinion, the legal issue raised is one that should be considered by the court. Accordingly, I direct a review as requested. "The Honourable Chief Justice Finch"

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Code, s.680(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.