R. v. Reed
- Citation
- [1998] 1 SCR 753
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 29 April 1998
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal Dangerous Driving Causing Death / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 29 April 1998
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal Dangerous Driving Causing Death / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appellant's conduct — driving at night more than 20 km/h over the speed limit on a curve completely on the wrong side of the road — constituted a marked departure from the norm, supporting conviction for dangerous driving causing death; the Court of Appeal properly set aside the acquittals and remitted the matter for sentencing.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal decision allowing Crown's appeal and setting aside the acquittals is confirmed; matter remitted to trial judge for sentencing.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada
- Confirm the British Columbia Court of Appeal order setting aside the acquittals
- Remit the matter to the trial judge for sentencing
02
Material facts
Parties
Ryan Robert Reed
Appellant Counsel: Brian E. Mickelson; Kenneth S. PurchaseHer Majesty The Queen
Respondent Counsel: Alexander BudlovskyAmounts and remedies
- Excess Speed (km/h): 20
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal Dangerous Driving Causing Death / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From British Columbia Court of Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused's driving constituted a 'marked departure from the norm' sufficient for conviction of dangerous driving causing death
- 02
Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to set aside the trial acquittals and remit for sentencing
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant contended the acquittals should be upheld because the evidence was insufficient to establish a marked departure from ordinary driving and therefore insufficient to convict for dangerous driving causing death.
- Respondent
- Crown argued the driving — at night, on a curve, totally on the wrong side of the road and more than 20 km/h over the speed limit — constituted a marked departure from the norm and justified setting aside the acquittals and remitting for sentencing.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
British Columbia Court of Appeal (Cumming J.), (1997), 26 M.V.R. 11, at p. 14
A 'marked departure from the norm' in driving is the proper standard to establish dangerous driving causing death
- 02
R. v. Reed, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 753
An appellate court may set aside acquittals where the evidence supports a conviction and remit the matter for sentencing
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appellant's conduct — driving at night more than 20 km/h over the speed limit on a curve completely on the wrong side of the road — constituted a marked departure from the norm, supporting conviction for dangerous driving causing death; the Court of Appeal properly set aside the acquittals and remitted the matter for sentencing.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal decision allowing Crown's appeal and setting aside the acquittals is confirmed; matter remitted to trial judge for sentencing.
- Appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada
- Confirm the British Columbia Court of Appeal order setting aside the acquittals
- Remit the matter to the trial judge for sentencing
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of Canada · 29 April 1998
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of Canada
Judgment· 29 April 1998
R. v. Reed Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1998-04-29 Report [1998] 1 SCR 753 Case number 25820 Judges Lamer, Antonio; Cory, Peter deCarteret; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Binnie, William Ian Corneil On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 25820 Decision Content R. v. Reed, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 753 Ryan Robert Reed Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Reed File No.: 25820. 1998: April 29. Present: Lamer C.J. and Cory, Iacobucci, Major and Binnie JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Motor vehicles -- Dangerous driving causing death. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1997), 86 B.C.A.C. 111, 142 W.A.C. 111, 26 M.V.R. (3d) 11, [1997] B.C.J. No. 211 (QL), allowing the Crown’s appeal and setting aside the accused’s acquittals on three counts of dangerous driving causing death, [1996] B.C.J. No. 241 (QL), [1996] B.C.W.L.D. 757, 30 W.C.B. (2d) 66. Appeal dismissed. Brian E. Mickelson and Kenneth S. Purchase, for the appellant. Alexander Budlovsky, for the respondent. //Cory J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 Cory J. ‑‑ We are in agreement with the decision of the Court of Appeal. Their reasons are summarized in these words of Justice Cumming: It cannot be said that the respondent’s driving of the type of motor vehicle he
had, at night, at a speed more than 20 kilometers in excess of the speed limit, on a curve and totally on the wrong side of the road, is other than a “marked departure from the norm.” ((1997), 26 M.V.R. 11, at p. 14.) 2 This appeal as of right is dismissed and the order of the Court of Appeal to remit the matter to the trial judge for sentencing is confirmed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Brian E. Mickelson Law Corporation, Vancouver. Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Vancouver.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.