Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v. Joseph

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court accepted the joint submission as consistent with prior Trans Mountain decisions and sentencing principles; accordingly for first offenders who entered early guilty pleas the appropriate sentence is either a $500 fine (five accused) or 25 hours community work service (one accused), together with a 12 month probation order containing specific conditions prohibiting obstruction of commercial traffic and imposing 100 metre exclusion zones at identified intersections, with payment and completion deadlines specified.

Court disposition

Guilty pleas accepted; sentences imposed as per joint submission: five accused fined $500 each and given 12 months probation; one accused ordered to complete 25 hours community service and 12 months probation.

02

Material facts

Parties

Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

Plaintiff Counsel: C.S. Johnson, Q.C.; A.C. Nelson

Frank Joseph

Defendant Counsel: J. Doyle

Danielle Violet Josephine Guerrero

Defendant Counsel: J. Doyle

Justin John Tollenaar

Defendant Counsel: J. Doyle

Haley Lackie

Defendant Counsel: T.B. Magder

Amanda Goulding

Defendant Counsel: M.F. Silongan

Amber Lynn Statters

Defendant Counsel: J. Doyle

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine Per Defendant: CAD 500
  • Community Work Hours (one Defendant): 25
  • Probation Period (months): 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Contempt (blockade of Port) / Sentencing (oral Reasons; Joint Submission Accepted)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff (Vancouver Fraser Port Authority) advanced a joint sentence submission consistent with the Trans Mountain series: for first offenders who plead early the usual sentence is either a $500 fine or 25 hours of community work service, plus 12 months probation with specified conditions; this is appropriate and maintains parity with prior decisions.
Respondent
Each accused accepted responsibility and entered early guilty pleas; defence relied on early plea and first offender status as mitigation and consented to the joint submission recommending either $500 fine or 25 hours community service and 12 months probation with conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair (series), Supreme Court of British Columbia

    Parity and consistency in sentencing for like conduct

  2. 02

    Established sentencing principles applied by Supreme Court of British Columbia decisions

    Mitigation for early guilty plea and first offender status

  3. 03

    Inherent contempt and injunctive enforcement jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of British Columbia

    Probation and specific prohibitory conditions are appropriate to prevent repetition and protect property and commercial access

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court accepted the joint submission as consistent with prior Trans Mountain decisions and sentencing principles; accordingly for first offenders who entered early guilty pleas the appropriate sentence is either a $500 fine (five accused) or 25 hours community work service (one accused), together with a 12 month probation order containing specific conditions prohibiting obstruction of commercial traffic and imposing 100 metre exclusion zones at identified intersections, with payment and completion deadlines specified.

Obiter and limits

  • Court noted delays in proceedings caused by COVID-19 and procedural matters
  • Court observed that the proposed sentence would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute
  • Court thanked counsel for professional resolution of the matter

Court disposition

Guilty pleas accepted; sentences imposed as per joint submission: five accused fined $500 each and given 12 months probation; one accused ordered to complete 25 hours community service and 12 months probation.

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of British Columbia · 30 June 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Judgment· 30 June 2021

2021 BCSC 1527

2021 BCSC 1527 Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v. Joseph

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v. Joseph, 2021 BCSC 1527 Date: 20210630 Docket: 31596-1, 31596-2, 31596-3, 31596-4, 31596-5, 31596-6 Registry: Vancouver Between: Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Plaintiff And Frank Joseph, Danielle Violet Josephine Guerrero, Justin John Tollenaar, Haley Lackie, Amanda Goulding and Amber Lynn Statters Defendants Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Tammen Oral Reasons for Sentence Counsel for the Plaintiff: C.S. Johnson, Q.C. A.C. Nelson Counsel for the Accused, Joseph Frank, Danielle Guerrero, Justin Tollenaar, and Amber Statters: J. Doyle Counsel for the Accused, Haley Lackie: T.B. Magder Counsel for the Accused, Amanda Goulding: M.F. Silongan Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. June 30, 2021 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. June 30, 2021 [1] THE COURT: Before the court for sentencing are six individuals who have entered guilty pleas to an allegation of criminal contempt arising from protest activity amounting to a blockade of the entrance to the Port of Vancouver and the adjacent city streets on February 25, 2020. That protest activity and blockade was in violation of an order I made on February 9, 2020, enjoining all individuals from blockading access to the various port entrances in the Lower Mainland. [2] Immediately following their arrest by members of the Vancouver Police

Department, these six individuals were released on an appearance notice with a return date in this court approximately one year ago. Largely due to COVID, the first appearance in this court was delayed. There was then a further delay while various procedural issues were addressed, including a summary determination by this court as to the nature of the contempt to which the six respondents would enter pleas of guilty. [3] I am told by their counsel and accept that each of the six accepts responsibility for their actions and wishes to enter a guilty plea at an early stage of proceedings. [4] The submission before me today is a joint submission on sentence which Mr. Nelson for the plaintiff, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, says is consistent with the position taken by Crown counsel and adopted by the court in the series of cases that came before this court under the style of cause Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair. In those cases, the usual sentence that was imposed for a first offender following an early guilty plea was either a fine of $500 or 25 hours of community work service. That is the sentence proposed here. I am satisfied that it is the appropriate type of sentence to impose in this case. Such a sentence would in no way bring the administration of justice into disrepute and is in keeping with previous decisions of this court. [5] I do intend to sentence in keeping

with the proposed joint submission. [6] With respect to the accused, Amber Statters, the sentence is as follows. There will be a period of 12 months' probation. The terms of probation are as follows: a) You must keep the peace and be of good behaviour; b) You must appear before the court when required to do so by the court; c) You must notify the court or the probation officer (PO) in advance of any change of name or address, and promptly notify the court or the PO of any change of employment or occupation; d) You must not impede or obstruct any commercial traffic or any vehicle from entering or exiting Vancouver Fraser Port Authority lands; e) You must not be within 100 metres of the intersections of: i. Hastings Street and Clark Drive in Vancouver, BC, except while in a moving motor vehicle for the sole purpose of travelling to and from the Vancouver Aboriginal Friendship Centre; ii. McGill Street and Commissioner Street in Vancouver, BC; and iii. Heatley Avenue and Powell Street in Vancouver, BC; f) You must report by telephone to a probation office at 275 East Cordova Street on or before 4:00 p.m., July 2, 2021, and thereafter as directed until you have completed your community work service hours; and g) You must complete 25 hours of community work service under the direct supervision of the probation officer. Your community work service must be completed by 4:00 p.m.,

December 31, 2021. [7] With respect to the remaining five accused, Justin Tollenaar, Amanda Goulding, Hal Lackie, Frank Joseph, and Danielle Guerrero, the sentence will be similar, but rather than 25 hours of community work service, there will be a fine payable in the amount of $500. [8] The sentence for each of the five individuals will be as follows. There will be a fine in the amount of $500 payable to the Attorney General of British Columbia by 4:00 p.m., September 30, 2021. There will be a probation order for a period of 12 months. The terms of that probation order will be as follows: a) You must keep the peace and be of good behaviour. b) You must appear before the court when required to do so by the court. c) You must notify the court or the PO in advance of any change of name or address, and promptly notify the court or the PO of any change of employment or occupation. d) You must not impede or obstruct any commercial traffic or any vehicle from entering or exiting Vancouver Fraser Port Authority lands. e) You must not be within 100 metres of the intersections of: i. Hastings Street and Clark Drive in Vancouver, British Columbia, except while in a moving motor vehicle for the sole purpose of travelling to and from the Vancouver Aboriginal Friendship Centre; ii. McGill Street and Commissioner Street in Vancouver, British Columbia; and iii. Heatley Avenue and Powell

Street in Vancouver, British Columbia. [9] Ms. Magder? [10] MS. MAGDER: My Lord, while you were reading that out, I just remembered, September 30, 2021, I believe, is potentially going to be a statutory holiday, so I wasn't sure if you wanted to just change that date? [11] THE COURT: That is the date by which the fine is payable? [12] MS. MAGDER: Yes, My Lord. [13] THE COURT: It does not matter. [14] MS. MAGDER: Okay. [15] THE COURT: But thank you for bringing that to my attention. So that is the end date by which the fine must be paid. [16] Anything else then from any counsel that has come to mind as I have been reading those terms? Okay, and any questions from any of the accused about the conditions I have just imposed? No, I see shaking heads. [17] I want to thank counsel once again for the professional way in which this matter was resolved. "Tammen J."

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair (series), Supreme Court of British Columbia

Case cited

Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v. Joseph, 2021 BCSC 1527

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.