JSJZ2020 v The Pensions Regulator
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Posture
- Appeal / Decision
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal was struck out due to the appellant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions requiring provision of the Decision Notice.
Court disposition
appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out under rule 8(3)(a) for non-compliance with a Tribunal direction.
02
Material facts
Parties
JSJZ2020
AppellantThe Pensions Regulator
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Appeal / Decision
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal should be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal directions
Party arguments
- Applicant
- No argument presented; appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions.
- Respondent
- No argument presented; respondent's position not stated.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 8(3)(a) of Tribunal Rules
Appeal may be struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal directions.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal was struck out due to the appellant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions requiring provision of the Decision Notice.
Court disposition
appeal struck out
- The appeal is struck out under rule 8(3)(a) for non-compliance with a Tribunal direction.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
SO NCN: [2025] UKFTT 01323 (GRC) First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Pensions Case Reference: FT/PEN/2025/0187 Decided without a hearing Decision given on: 11 November 2025 Before
JUDGE HARRIS Between JSJZ2020 and
THE PENSIONS REGULATOR Appellant Respondent Decision: The appeal is struck out under rule 8(3)(a) for non-compliance with a Tribunal direction.
REASONS 1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 8 August 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision notice they sought to challenge.
2. By Directions and email dated 14 August 2025 the Appellant was required to provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge to the Tribunal within 28 days. The Appellant did not comply with that Direction.
3. By Directions dated 10 October 2025, the Appellant was directed by 24 October 2025 to provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge to the Tribunal. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 4. The Appellant was directed to note that failure to comply with the Direction could lead to the Tribunal striking out the appeal for failure to comply without further direction.
5. The Appellant failed to comply with the Direction dated 10 October 2025 and accordingly there are grounds to strike out the appeal. Signed: Judge Harris Date: 7 November 2025 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.