Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction because the statutory conditions for appeal under section 44 of the Pensions Act 2008 were not met; no review was conducted by the Regulator within the prescribed period, and presumptions of service apply to notices sent to the business address.
Source excerpt
The reference was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with repeated Tribunal directions to provide the required Decision Notice.
Source excerpt
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with explicit tribunal directions and failed to co-operate, preventing the Tribunal from dealing with the proceedings fairly and justly.
Source excerpt
The appeal was struck out because the Appellant failed to comply with repeated Tribunal directions to provide required documents, justifying striking out under rule 8(3)(a).
Source excerpt
The Tribunal struck out an appeal against a ÂŁ400 pensions fixed penalty notice for want of jurisdiction, and said it would dismiss the appeal in any event.
The tribunal dismissed an appeal against a ÂŁ400 fixed penalty notice under the Pensions Act 2008, finding no reasonable excuse and no rebuttal of service.
The First-tier Tribunal struck out Salt and Vine Limited’s appeal against pension penalty notices, finding no reasonable prospect of success and no rebuttal of service.
The tribunal dismissed Colrei Limited’s appeal against a £400 fixed penalty notice, found the compliance notice was received, and held no reasonable excuse was shown.
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction because no review of the fixed penalty notice was requested within the prescribed period and statutory presumptions of service were not rebutted.
Source excerpt
The notices were properly served to the appellant's registered address, the appellant's bare assertion of non-receipt is insufficient to displace the presumption of service, and the penalty is appropriate and fixed by statute.
Source excerpt
Explore more
