R v Lee Michael Calvert
The Court found the retraction statement by RC to be unreliable due to inconsistencies between contemporaneous notes and the statement, the circumstances of its production, and RC's own disavowal of its contents. The Court concluded that the safety of the conviction is not undermined and it is not necessary in the interests of justice to admit the fresh evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Lee Michael Calvert
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction on CCRC Reference
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Fresh Evidence, Witness Credibility, Cell Confession, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Lee Michael Calvert
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction on CCRC Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence regarding the credibility of a key prosecution witness (RC) renders the conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether the retraction statement by RC should be admitted as fresh evidence
- 3 Whether the conviction should be quashed based on the reliability of RC's evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the retraction statement by RC to be unreliable due to inconsistencies between contemporaneous notes and the statement, the circumstances of its production, and RC's own disavowal of its contents. The Court concluded that the safety of the conviction is not undermined and it is not necessary in the interests of justice to admit the fresh evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Fresh evidence not admitted
- Conviction upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment