R v Lee Michael Calvert

R v Lee Michael Calvert

The Court found the retraction statement by RC to be unreliable due to inconsistencies between contemporaneous notes and the statement, the circumstances of its production, and RC's own disavowal of its contents. The Court concluded that the safety of the conviction is not undermined and it is not necessary in the interests of justice to admit the fresh evidence. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Lee Michael Calvert
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction on CCRC Reference
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Fresh Evidence, Witness Credibility, Cell Confession, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Lee Michael Calvert

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction on CCRC Reference

  1. 1 Whether fresh evidence regarding the credibility of a key prosecution witness (RC) renders the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the retraction statement by RC should be admitted as fresh evidence
  3. 3 Whether the conviction should be quashed based on the reliability of RC's evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the retraction statement by RC to be unreliable due to inconsistencies between contemporaneous notes and the statement, the circumstances of its production, and RC's own disavowal of its contents. The Court concluded that the safety of the conviction is not undermined and it is not necessary in the interests of justice to admit the fresh evidence. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Fresh evidence not admitted
  • Conviction upheld