England and Wales Judgment

Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) (16 February 2026)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that Convatec Ltd's product fell within the scope of Parsons' patent claims and that the patent was valid, as the invention was novel and involved an inventive step.

Court disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Injunction granted restraining Convatec Ltd from infringing the patent
  • Damages to be assessed
  • Convatec Ltd to pay costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Parsons

Claimant

Convatec Ltd

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Patent Infringement / High Court Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Parsons argued that Convatec Ltd's product infringed the claims of the patent and that the patent is valid.
Respondent
Convatec Ltd argued that their product does not infringe the patent and challenged the validity of Parsons' patent on grounds of obviousness and lack of novelty.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Patents Act 1977, section 60

    A patent is infringed if all elements of a claim are present in the alleged infringing product or process.

  2. 02

    Patents Act 1977, sections 1 and 3

    A patent may be revoked if it lacks novelty or is obvious to a person skilled in the art.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that Convatec Ltd's product fell within the scope of Parsons' patent claims and that the patent was valid, as the invention was novel and involved an inventive step.

Court disposition

claim allowed

  • Injunction granted restraining Convatec Ltd from infringing the patent
  • Damages to be assessed
  • Convatec Ltd to pay costs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2026] EWHC 325 (Pat)

Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) (16 February 2026) [ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] England and Wales High Court (Patents Court) Decisions You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Patents Court) Decisions >> Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) (16 February 2026) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2026/325.html Cite as: [2026] WLR(D) 171, [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [View ICLR summary: [2026] WLR(D) 171 ] [ Help ] Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) (16 February 2026) Approved A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2026/325.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Patents Act 1977

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.