Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property [2026] EWHC 1027 (Pat)

AMI Industries, Inc v Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd

AMI Industries, Inc v Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd [2026] EWHC 1027 (Pat) (01 May 2026)

The High Court held that Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd infringed AMI Industries, Inc’s patent, upheld the patent’s validity, and granted injunctive and monetary relief.

  • Patent infringement
  • Validity of patent
  • Relief for infringement
  • Patent-infringement
  • Patent-validity
  • Intellectual-property
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat)

Parsons v Convatec Ltd

Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2026] EWHC 325 (Pat) (16 February 2026)

The Patents Court held that Convatec Ltd infringed Parsons’ patent, upheld the patent’s validity, granted an injunction, ordered damages to be assessed, and awarded costs.

  • Patent infringement
  • Validity of patent
  • Injunctions
  • Patent-infringement
  • Patent-validity
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2020] EWHC 2104 (Pat)

Shenzhen Carku Technology Co Ltd v The Noco Company

Shenzhen Carku Technology Co Ltd v The Noco Company [2020] EWHC 2104 (Pat) (24 July 2020)

The High Court refused Carku’s applications for summary judgment and an interim declaration in a patent dispute over jump starter devices.

  • Patent infringement
  • Summary judgment
  • Interim declaration
  • Doctrine of equivalents
  • Validity of patent
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2018] EWHC 1224 (Pat)

Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Incorporation & Ors

Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Incorporation & Ors [2018] EWHC 1224 (Pat) (23 May 2018)

The High Court held Philips’ patent valid and infringed, rejecting obviousness attacks based on Motorola 021 and Shad in an HSDPA/UMTS context.

  • Obviousness
  • Validity of patent
  • Mobile telecommunications standards
  • Power control in radio communications
  • Error control in arq/harq systems
  • Patent-validity
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.