England and Wales Judgment

Paul Threadwell v The Pensions Regulator

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a tribunal direction requiring resubmission of a complete notice of appeal, despite being warned that non-compliance could result in striking out.

Court disposition

Appeal struck out

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.

02

Material facts

Parties

Paul Threadwell

Appellant

The Pensions Regulator

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Appeal / Striking Out of Appeal at Preliminary Stage

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
No argument advanced; appellant did not respond or comply with directions.
Respondent
No argument recorded; matter determined on procedural non-compliance.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 8(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009

    The tribunal may strike out proceedings if the appellant fails to comply with a direction that warned of striking out as a consequence.

  2. 02

    Rule 22(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009

    Appellant must provide with the notice of appeal a copy of any written record of the challenged decision and any statement of reasons for that decision.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a tribunal direction requiring resubmission of a complete notice of appeal, despite being warned that non-compliance could result in striking out.

Court disposition

Appeal struck out

  • The appeal is struck out.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

NCN: [2026] UKFTT 00142 (GRC) First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Pensions Regulation Case Reference: FT/PEN/2025/0273 Decided without a hearing Decision given on: 29 January 2026 Before

JUDGE SHENAZ MUZAFFER Between

PAUL THREADWELL and

THE PENSIONS REGULATOR Appellant Respondent Decision: The appeal is struck out.

REASONS 1. The Appellant lodged his appeal with the Tribunal by email dated 09 December 2025.

2. Rule 8(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 provides that the Tribunal may strike out the whole or a part of the proceedings if the Appellant has failed to comply with a direction which stated that failure by the Appellant to comply with the direction could lead to the striking out of the proceedings or part of them.

3. On 10 December 2026 an email was sent to the Appellant by the Tribunal. The email stated that the appeal had been received but that it did not meet the requirement of rule 22(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 that “If the proceedings challenge a decision, the appellant must provide with the notice of appeal a copy of any written record of that decision, and any statement of reasons for that decision that the appellant has or can reasonably obtain”. Case Management Directions were also attached to the email. The Case Management Directions stated that the Appellant must resubmit a Notice of Appeal that included all of the required documentation and information within 28 days of the date that the directions were sent.

4. The resubmitted Notice of Appeal should therefore have been provided by 07 January 2026.

5. The Case Management Directions also stated the following: “Important: This document is: 1. …..

2. A formal notice under rule 8(3)(a) of the 2009 Rules that a failure to comply with these directions could lead to the striking out of proceedings. 3. …..” 6. The Appellant has not responded to the above direction and has not complied with it.

7. I am satisfied that the Appellant has not complied with the direction and has made no attempt to do so. The Appellant was notified that a failure to comply with the direction could lead to the appeal being struck out. In all of the circumstances, and taking into account the interests of justice and the overriding objective, it is appropriate to strike out the appeal and I therefore do so. Signed: Judge Shenaz Muzaffer Dated: 26 January 2026

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.