Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Police law [2026] EWHC 747 (KB)

Clarke v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police

Clarke v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2026] EWHC 747 (KB) (27 March 2026)

The High Court allowed a child claimant’s appeal, holding that his arrest at school was not unavoidable and was therefore unlawful under PACE.

  • False imprisonment
  • Assault
  • Arrest of juveniles
  • Police powers
  • Necessity of arrest
  • Reasonable suspicion
Read case analysis
Police law

The Chief Constable of Essex v Matthew Carter

The Recorder erred in law by requiring a reasonable belief under Section 54(4) of PACE; the statute only requires an honest belief. On the facts, the custody officer had an honest and reasonable belief that removal of clothing was necessary for safety. The use of force was justified and proportionate. The appeal is allowed and judgment entered for the Appellant.

  • Use of force by police
  • Strip search
  • Damages for assault/battery
  • Pace section 54
  • Reasonableness standard
Read case analysis
Police law [2024] EWHC 126 (KB)

Chief Constable of Essex v Carter

Chief Constable of Essex v Carter [2024] EWHC 126 (KB) (02 February 2024)

The High Court held that police lawfully removed a detainee’s clothing under PACE s.54(4), allowing the appeal and reducing damages.

  • Use of force by police
  • Strip search
  • Assault and battery
  • Damages for personal injury
  • Pace 1984 s.54
  • Reasonableness of police belief
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] EWHC 1280

ST v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police

ST v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2022] EWHC 1280 (QB) (26 May 2022)

High Court appeal on a 14-year-old's arrest and detention for robbery. The court held the arrest and custody were lawful under PACE, despite strong criticism of the police conduct.

  • False imprisonment
  • Lawfulness of arrest
  • Necessity for arrest
  • Detention of juveniles
  • Police conduct
  • Pace 1984 s.24
Read case analysis
Public law [2020] EWHC 3246 (Admin)

Reay & Sherlock v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police

Reay & Sherlock v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2020] EWHC 3246 (Admin) (27 November 2020)

The High Court dismissed an appeal over arrests made during a Newcastle protest operation, holding the police had reasonable grounds to believe arrest was necessary under PACE.

  • Lawfulness of arrest
  • Police powers
  • Necessity test
  • Public order policing
  • Summary arrest
  • Section 24 police and criminal evidence act 1984
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] EWHC 2837 (QB)

Pal v C.O.P.

Pal v C.O.P. [2018] EWHC 2837 (QB) (23 August 2018)

The High Court granted permission to appeal in a wrongful arrest case, holding it was arguable that an article and tweet did not amount to harassment by speech.

  • Harassment
  • Freedom of expression
  • Wrongful arrest
  • Article 10 echr
  • Article-10-echr
  • Wrongful-arrest
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Frugal v Nottinghamshire Police

The Court of Appeal dismissed a false imprisonment appeal, holding that an undercover officer was not an agent provocateur and that arresting police had reasonable grounds.

  • False imprisonment
  • Agent provocateur
  • Lawfulness of arrest
  • False-imprisonment
  • Agent-provocateur
  • Lawfulness-of-arrest
Read case analysis
Immigration law

Fardous v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The High Court held that immigration detention was lawful for the first 12 months, but became unlawful thereafter, making 8 months of the 22-month detention unlawful.

  • Unlawful detention
  • Immigration detention
  • Judicial review
  • Hardial singh principles
  • Immigration-detention
  • Unlawful-detention
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure [2013] EWHC 243

Lord Hanningfield of Chelmsford v Chief Constable of Essex Police

Lord Hanningfield of Chelmsford v Chief Constable of Essex Police [2013] EWHC 243 (QB) (15 February 2013)

The High Court held that Lord Hanningfield’s arrest was not objectively necessary under PACE, making the resulting search and detention unlawful.

  • Unlawful arrest
  • Search and seizure
  • Detention
  • Police and criminal evidence act 1984 (pace)
  • Necessity test for arrest
  • Compensation for unlawful police conduct
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.