Afan Valley Ltd & Ors v Lupton Fawcett LLP
The claimants failed to establish any recoverable loss within the scope of Lupton Fawcett's duty of care. Any liability to repay investors under s.26 FSMA was matched by the receipt of equivalent funds, and commissions or fees were not within the risks against which the defendant's duty was intended to protect. The claim for compensation under s.26(2)(b) FSMA was not pleaded, and in any event, any such liability would not exceed the claimants' exposure to contractual or tortious claims in the counterfactual scenario. The application to amend pleadings and adduce new evidence on appeal was ref…
Source excerpt
- Solicitor's duty of care
- Collective investment schemes
- Financial services and markets act 2000 (fsma)
- Summary judgment
- Strike out
- Scope of duty