Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal refused to strike out an appeal, holding that the DBS’s notified decision letter conveyed a substantive review outcome and therefore engaged jurisdiction.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed MK’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, holding there was no error of law or fact and no unfairness in the evidence process.
The Upper Tribunal upheld DBS’s decision to bar KCN from work with children and adults, finding no mistake of law or fact despite his criminal acquittal.
The Upper Tribunal allowed Mrs B’s appeal against inclusion on the children’s barred list, finding DBS had made a material factual mistake about an alleged conversation.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against DBS barring decisions, finding the appellant did not receive notice and was denied the chance to make representations.
The Upper Tribunal upheld DWH’s inclusion on the Adults’ Barred List but removed him from the Children’s Barred List for lack of evidence of child-related regulated activity.
The Upper Tribunal allowed HET’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, found multiple mistakes of fact, and ordered her removal from both barred lists.
The Upper Tribunal held that JR satisfied the regulated activity test and had engaged in relevant conduct, but his inclusion on the adults’ barred list was disproportionate.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed MM’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, finding no material error of fact or law in the DBS’s findings, risk assessment, or proportionality.
The Upper Tribunal remitted the case to DBS for a new decision after finding inadequate reasons on insight and remorse, while upholding the barred-list decision as proportionate.
Explore more
