Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a proposed all-spills causation amendment in Bille oil-spill litigation and granted permission for an aggravated damages amendment.
DBL succeeded in claims against Mr Shafie for directors’ duties breaches and data extraction, and partly succeeded on dishonest assistance against others. Relief under section 1157 was refused.
The claimants failed to prove their case on the balance of probabilities due to numerous inconsistencies, poor witness performance, and lack of corroborative evidence. The evidence did not meet the substantial burden required to prove fraud or a staged accident.
Source excerpt
The High Court determined preliminary issues in a defamation claim about online posts, videos and billboards alleging serious criminality, and broadly accepted the claimant’s pleaded meanings.
Marinakis v Karypidou & Ors [2026] EWHC 1192 (KB) (20 May 2026)
High Court preliminary issues decision in a libel and unlawful means conspiracy claim over online publications alleging corruption, drug trafficking and match-fixing.
Liability trial in a clinical negligence claim. The court found the missed ECG monitoring caused a failure to diagnose paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the claimant’s stroke.
Dakin v South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWCC 26 (12 May 2026)
The court held that an admitted failure to arrange ECG monitoring caused a delayed AF diagnosis, anticoagulation was missed, and the claimant’s stroke was due to that breach.
The court decided preliminary issues on meaning in a defamation claim over emails alleging a marketing rival had mis-sold advertising space and acted fraudulently.
Guerrilla Marketing Ltd v NGM Advertising Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 1085 (KB) (08 May 2026)
Preliminary defamation issues over emails alleging a rival falsely sold advertising space on screens it did not own.
The High Court struck out parts of a sexual assault and harassment claim, ordered amended particulars and a medical report, and granted anonymity to both parties.
Explore more
