Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court held FLOWERBX was valid and infringed by FLOWERSBOX, FLOWERS BOX and FLOWERS BOX LONDON, rejecting descriptiveness and non-use arguments.
The High Court refused the defendants’ strike-out and summary judgment application in a dispute over alleged misuse of PROSECCO on websites targeting the UK.
Trade mark infringement and passing off claims by easyGroup over Easyfeet signs failed; the court found no likely confusion, link, detriment or unfair advantage.
Easygroup Ltd v Easyfeetstore OU & Ors [2026] EWHC 767 (IPEC) (01 April 2026)
The court dismissed easyGroup’s trade mark infringement, passing off, and invalidity claims over Easyfeet signs and held the descriptive “easy” prefix was not enough.
Parabolica Ltd v Tesla Holding AS [2026] EWHC 386 (Ch) (23 February 2026)
The High Court held that bad faith in a UK trade mark application derived from a pending EU filing is assessed by reference to the EU filing date, not the UK filing date.
The High Court held that a UK trade mark refiled from a pending EU application is assessed for bad faith by reference to the EU filing date, not the UK filing date.
Wang Zeng International Ltd v Bing Bing Foods Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 360 (IPEC) (20 February 2026)
The court held that the claimant’s pear trade marks were valid and infringed. The defendants failed in their invalidity and revocation counterclaim, and one director was held jointly liable.
easyGroup Ltd v Jaybank Leisure Ltd [2025] EWHC 3077 (IPEC) (21 November 2025)
The court found Jaybank’s use of EASIHIRE would have infringed easyGroup’s trade mark, but the claim failed because easyGroup could not defeat Jaybank’s non-use defence under s.11A.
Thom Browne Inc & Anor v Adidas AG [2025] EWCA Civ 1340 (23 October 2025)
The Court of Appeal upheld invalidity findings against six adidas three-stripe trade marks, holding their descriptions and images lacked sufficient clarity and precision.
easyGroup Ltd v Premier Inn Hotels Ltd [2025] EWHC 2229 (Ch) (29 August 2025)
The High Court dismissed easyGroup’s trade mark claims over Premier Inn’s “Rest easy” branding, finding no infringement, confusion, link, or detriment.
Explore more
