Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against a remediation contribution order, upholding joint and several liability and the inclusion of Type 1 Wall replacement costs.
The Upper Tribunal held that paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 BSA 2022 is not confined to relevant defects, upheld leaseholder protection for unsafe cladding, and dismissed the appeal.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against FTT case management directions, holding the appellants’ statutory arguments were premature and largely new points.
Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 846 (08 July 2025)
The Court of Appeal upheld remediation contribution orders against a developer and its associate under the Building Safety Act 2022, and held they can cover pre-commencement costs.
The Upper Tribunal set aside extra items in a remediation order because the FTT raised them unfairly, without proper evidence or a fair chance to answer.
The High Court refused BDW’s applications for information orders under the Building Safety Act 2022, holding the statutory test was not met and wider powers should not be used.
BDW Trading Ltd v Ardmore Construction Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 434 (TCC) (27 February 2025)
The High Court refused BDW Trading’s application for information orders under section 132 of the Building Safety Act 2022 concerning Ardmore companies.
The Upper Tribunal adjourned this building-safety appeal, allowing the appellants to seek permission to amend their grounds and barring reliance on new evidence.
Rydon Group Holdings Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Arta Residents' Management Company Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 3234 (Admin) (10 December 2024)
The High Court granted permission for judicial review of decisions under the Building Safety Act remediation scheme, rejecting a bad faith challenge but allowing other public law grounds.
The Upper Tribunal held that a service charge for fire-safety works was not payable because the demand misidentified the landlord and the works were cladding remediation.
Explore more
