Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The just case management solution is to hear the remitted matters and the claimant’s summary judgment application separately and sequentially, with the remitted matters first, and not to stay the summary judgment application, balancing the interests of both parties and avoiding undue prejudice to other litigants.
Source excerpt
The court held that a director materially overstated turnover in a Bounce Back Loan application, made him unfit, and ordered disqualification and compensation.
Liquidators’ claims against two doctors failed: no proven employment contracts and no transaction at an undervalue where the payments had already been accounted for to HMRC.
The High Court dismissed a section 994 unfair prejudice petition concerning Liberas Solutions Ltd, finding the challenged payments, banking controls and consultant arrangements were justified.
DBL succeeded in claims against Mr Shafie for directors’ duties breaches and data extraction, and partly succeeded on dishonest assistance against others. Relief under section 1157 was refused.
The court dismissed Barclays' strike-out challenge and allowed amendment of the particulars of claim, subject to two wording changes, in claims for dishonest assistance and Quincecare breach.
Transfers of shares by Aliotta Holdings to Mr Sleater and Mr Whitehead in 2024 were at an undervalue and intended to put assets beyond reach of claimants, engaging section 423 and requiring reversal; subsequent 2025 transfers were for sufficient consideration and not at undervalue, so section 423 did not apply.
Source excerpt
The court is satisfied that the jurisdictional gateways under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 are met, the proposed class constitution for meetings is appropriate, adequate notice has been given, and there are no discernible roadblocks or futility in proceeding. Three class meetings (Growler, Noteholders, Shareholders) are ordered to be convened to consider the restructuring plan.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that Neil Macpherson was a de facto and shadow director, the company was insolvent, and most challenged payments were recoverable.
The High Court granted a proprietary injunction over trust assets, appointed Ms Lake as a representative party, and refused a freezing injunction.
Explore more
