Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction because the statutory conditions for appeal under section 44 of the Pensions Act 2008 were not met; no review was conducted by the Regulator within the prescribed period, and presumptions of service apply to notices sent to the business address.
Source excerpt
The appellant's conduct, specifically sending inappropriate and sexual text messages to a pupil and engaging in unprofessional behaviour, fell short of the high standards required of an Approved Driving Instructor. The Tribunal found that the Registrar had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the appellant was not a fit and proper person to remain on the Register, and the appellant's personal circumstances did not mitigate the seriousness of the misconduct.
Source excerpt
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed his third attempt at the instructional ability test, and the law prohibits granting a trainee licence after such failure, leaving no reasonable prospect of success.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal dismissed Mr Mehmood’s appeal against refusal of a third ADI trainee licence, holding the Respondent’s decision was justified and the appeal was not made out.
The Tribunal dismissed an appeal against removal from the Approved Driving Instructors Register, holding the appellant was no longer fit and proper.
The appellant's conviction resulted from administrative oversight not within her control, and she has demonstrated improvement in processes and safeguards after each conviction. There is no evidence of dishonesty or pattern of unfit behaviour. On balance, the appellant meets the statutory requirement to be a fit and proper person, and removal from the Register is not justified.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed claims that a 2023 RNS and a 2024 statement misused private information or breached confidence in a Gambling Commission regulatory context.
The tribunal dismissed Mr Amine’s appeal against refusal of a third trainee driving instructor licence, confirming the respondent’s decision.
Tribunal upheld an ESOS civil penalty against Azenta UK Limited but reduced it slightly, finding the earlier notices were sufficiently served and the penalty only partly unreasonable.
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed Mark Jason Turnbull’s appeal against refusal of a third trainee driving instructor licence, upholding the Respondent’s 30 March 2026 decision.
Explore more
