Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Petrichor Energy FZCO v Bashar & Anor [2026] EWHC 914 (Comm) (30 March 2026)
The High Court granted a post-judgment worldwide freezing order and alternative service by email, finding a good arguable case of asset dissipation risk.
Frischmann v Vaxeal Holdings SA & Ors [2026] EWHC 694 (Ch) (24 March 2026)
The High Court refused a judgment debtor’s request for a transcript at public expense, finding he had not shown lack of means or necessity under CPR 52.14.
Frischmann v Vaxeal Holdings SA & Ors [2026] EWHC 854 (Ch) (18 March 2026)
The High Court refused to vary a passport order, finding a real risk of flight and no sufficient hardship. Costs were awarded on the indemnity basis.
The Commercial Court refused to raise a freezing-order disclosure threshold, but increased fortification of the cross-undertaking and ordered payment into Court.
The court found material non-disclosure and economic oppression by the respondent, invalidated the purported nuptial agreement, determined the marital pot based on evidenced assets, and ordered transfer of art, lump sum payment, child maintenance, and costs, prioritizing the welfare of the children and the applicant's needs.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to provide credible evidence of asset dissipation sufficient to justify disclosure under CPR 25.1(1)(g); the evidence presented falls below the low bar required for jurisdictional and discretionary relief.
Source excerpt
The defendant was properly served, had full notice, deliberately failed to comply with the asset disclosure provisions of the freezing order, and demonstrated contumacious conduct. The breach is deliberate, persistent, and causes prejudice to the claimants. The appropriate sentence is two years' imprisonment, with six months to be remitted upon full compliance.
Source excerpt
The court decided consequential matters after a freezing order judgment, awarding the defendants 75% of their costs, summarily assessed at £32,500, and requiring cross-undertakings from the claimants.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) (15 January 2026)
Financial remedies judgment finding a purported nuptial agreement invalid, valuing the marital pot, and ordering transfer of artworks, a lump sum, child maintenance, and costs.
Sahota & Anor v Newman [2025] EWHC 3174 (Ch) (02 December 2025)
The High Court found the defendant in contempt for failing to comply with a freezing order requiring asset disclosure and imposed 12 months’ imprisonment.
Explore more
