Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v RNM & Ors
Given the severity and irreversibility of RN’s brain and brain stem injury, his total dependence on invasive ventilation, lack of meaningful awareness or purposeful movement, ongoing pain and suffering from medical interventions, and the unanimous medical evidence that continued life-sustaining treatment confers no benefit and only prolongs suffering, it is not in RN’s best interests for life-sustaining treatment to continue. The presumption in favour of preserving life is rebutted on these facts.
Source excerpt
- Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment
- Best interests of child
- Parental responsibility
- Medical futility
- Inherent jurisdiction
- Declarations as to lawfulness of treatment withdrawal