Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Siem & Ors v Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP [2026] EWHC 1168 (Ch) (18 May 2026)
Professional negligence claim dismissed after the High Court held WBD had not breached any duty in relation to warranty protections and retention advice.
Liability trial in a clinical negligence claim. The court found the missed ECG monitoring caused a failure to diagnose paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the claimant’s stroke.
Dakin v South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWCC 26 (12 May 2026)
The court held that an admitted failure to arrange ECG monitoring caused a delayed AF diagnosis, anticoagulation was missed, and the claimant’s stroke was due to that breach.
The High Court dismissed a mesothelioma claim because the claimants failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the deceased was exposed to asbestos at Sizewell A.
Devall & Ors v English Electric Company Ltd [2026] EWHC 1025 (KB) (01 May 2026)
High Court asbestos claim dismissed: the claimants failed to prove that Mr Devall was exposed to asbestos at Sizewell A during his 1965 placement.
Seppings v Crampsie & Son Ltd t/a The New Inn Roughton [2026] EWHC 859 (KB) (23 April 2026)
Trial on liability only in a premises injury claim: the court found the pub breached its duty of care, but the claimant failed to prove causation, so the claim was dismissed.
Clinical negligence trial about spinal surgery complications. The court held the claimant’s cardiac arrest was caused by pulmonary embolism, not hyperkalaemia, and dismissed the claim.
Guest v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 704 (KB) (31 March 2026)
Clinical negligence trial over spinal surgery. The court held a disputed potassium result was spurious and found the cardiac arrest was caused by pulmonary embolism, so the claim was dismissed.
Ridge owed Eiger a duty of care in contract and tort to advise with reasonable skill and care on project pricing, cost to completion, and risks. Ridge breached this duty by failing to provide proper analysis, failing to highlight significant risks, and not obtaining informed consent for conflict of interest. Eiger relied on Ridge's report in entering the loan agreement, and suffered recoverable loss as the loan contained a significant undisclosed risk of cost overrun. The quantum of loss is the difference between the advised cost to completion and the market benchmarked figure, assessed at £2…
Source excerpt
Eiger Funding (PCC) Ltd v Ridge and Partners LLP [2026] EWHC 609 (TCC) (16 March 2026)
The High Court held Ridge liable in professional negligence for an unsound monitoring report on a Liverpool development loan, awarding Eiger £2.5 million.
Explore more
