Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application to hear the CPR Part 18 request was refused because it would be unfair and unjust to proceed with insufficient notice to JCB, despite the application's apparent simplicity and prior awareness.
Source excerpt
Wei & Ors v Long & Ors [2025] EWHC 158 (KB) (31 January 2025)
The High Court set aside service out on D4, held Porkbun LLC was not a publisher or website operator, granted relief from sanctions, and dismissed the Claimants’ s.13 and Part 18 applications.
The High Court refused a pre-pleading CPR Part 18 request for further information in fraud and misrepresentation claims, holding it was premature and unnecessary at that stage.
X Y Z v Various companies (PIP Breast Implant Litigation) [2013] EWHC 3643 (QB) (22 November 2013)
In PIP breast implant group litigation, the High Court refused Part 18 disclosure of insurance details but ordered a witness statement to the court on funding adequacy for case management.
Spy Academy Ltd. v Sakar International Inc [2009] EWCA Civ 481 (27 March 2009)
The Court of Appeal granted permission to appeal on a security for costs issue after finding a material procedural error in excluding the appellant's evidence.
The Commercial Court refused Total’s request for disclosure of TAV’s insurance arrangements, holding that insurance details were not relevant to the issues or case management.
West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd & Anor v Total UK Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 1296 (Comm) (09 June 2008)
The High Court refused Total’s request for disclosure of TAV’s insurance arrangements, holding that insurance cover was not relevant to apportionment or case management.
Explore more
