Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
CGT, R (On the Application Of) v West Sussex County Council [2026] EWHC 293 (Admin) (13 February 2026)
Judicial review of a council’s refusal to fund care from a personal injury trust succeeded; the court held the trust capital had to be disregarded under the Care Act regime.
The High Court held that West Sussex County Council unlawfully refused to fund a claimant’s care and to recover past payments, because the personal injury trust fund had to be disregarded under the Care Act regime.
Permission to apply for judicial review is granted on grounds that the Defendant arguably failed to act with appropriate diligence and expedition in arranging the Claimant's release from immigration detention after grant of conditional bail, failed to comply with AAR policies, and breached the Equality Act 2010; interim relief is granted requiring the Defendant to provide suitable Section 95 accommodation in Scotland to facilitate release, but permission is refused for duplicative or unsubstantiated grounds including Article 3 ECHR.
Source excerpt
BRO, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev3) [2025] EWHC 2231 (Admin) (26 August 2025)
The High Court granted permission on four judicial review grounds about immigration detention, equality duties, and section 95 accommodation, and ordered interim relief to facilitate release.
ZZ v Croydon Council [2025] EWHC 1916 (Admin) (24 July 2025)
The High Court quashed Croydon Council’s unlawful Care Act assessment and ordered a fresh review, but transferred damages to the County Court.
The court quashed Croydon Council’s unlawful Care Act assessment, ordered a fresh assessment and care plan, transferred damages to the County Court, and refused indemnity costs.
No combined duty exists requiring local authorities to operate a system ensuring same-sex personal/intimate care for female service users; statutory duties under the Care Act 2014, Equality Act 2010, and Human Rights Act 1998 are satisfied by current practice and regulatory framework, and no unlawful discrimination or breach of public sector equality duty is established.
Source excerpt
MM, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Home Department & Anor [2025] EWHC 143 (Admin) (28 January 2025)
The High Court enforced an interim relief order requiring Hillingdon to secure suitable accommodation and dismissed the council’s bid to discharge it.
The High Court held Stoke-on-Trent City Council’s 1.4% care-home fee uplift unlawful for inadequate consultation, Care Act guidance failures, PSED breach, and irrationality.
The High Court enforced interim relief requiring accommodation for a detained claimant and refused to discharge the order, finding no significant change of circumstances.
Explore more
