Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
EC3 Brokers Ltd, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 829 (Ch) (14 April 2026)
The court approved a scheme for distributing EC3 Brokers’ client money in administration, using reconstructed records, a risk-transfer presumption, and a bar date.
The court approved a client-money distribution scheme for EC3 Brokers Ltd in administration and allowed the administrators’ remuneration and costs from the pool.
Sova Capital Ltd, Re [2023] EWHC 2690 (Ch) (03 October 2023)
The High Court approved a hard bar date and a claims adjudication procedure in Sova Capital’s special administration, finding the administrators had taken reasonable steps to notify claimants.
The High Court approved a final client money distribution mechanism for Pritchard Stockbrokers Ltd, including a bar date and extinguishment of non-claiming interests.
Pritchard Stockbrokers Ltd, Re [2019] EWHC 137 (Ch) (06 February 2019)
The High Court approved a final client-money distribution scheme for Pritchard Stockbrokers Ltd, including a bar date and de minimis threshold, to complete special administration.
Worldspreads Ltd, Re Investent Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 [2015] EWHC 1719 (Ch) (19 June 2015)
The High Court authorised Worldspreads’ administrators to set a bar date and make a final client money distribution, including disregarding unresponsive and de minimis claims.
The High Court approved final-distribution directions for Worldspreads’ client money pool, including a bar date, treatment of unresponsive and small claims, and claim-determination procedures.
MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration), Re [2013] EWHC 1655 (Ch) (14 June 2013)
The High Court approved a client money distribution procedure for MF Global UK, allowing distributions despite rejected or unknown claims, under its inherent trust jurisdiction.
The High Court held that client money entitlements for open positions are valued at the PPE by notional closing prices, not later close-out values.
Explore more
