Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 1113 (Ch) (15 May 2026)
The court held that MSD remained bound by the confidentiality agreement and could not use the disclosed documents for collateral purposes without a targeted application.
NG (A Child), Re (Disclosure of Asylum Documents)(No 1) [2026] EWHC 412 (Fam) (25 February 2026)
The High Court ordered disclosure of asylum documents in a child return dispute, with redactions and strict limits on collateral use.
The Upper Tribunal held that FSMA’s confidentiality regime displaces any collateral-use rule for documents provided to the FCA in reference proceedings.
AAA v BBB & Ors (Re Consequentials) [2025] EWHC 1763 (Comm) (04 July 2025)
The court refused permission for collateral use of materials from a discharged freezing order, finding no jurisdiction for fresh relief and serious disclosure breaches.
The High Court struck out a conspiracy claim against Invesco, Orbitus and Stifel as an abusive collateral attack on earlier decisions and for misuse of disclosed documents.
The Commercial Court refused Eraaya’s mandatory injunction for release of $40m bond proceeds, joined the bondholders, and granted retrospective collateral-use permission.
Eraaya Lifespaces Ltd v Elara Capital PLC & Ors [2025] EWHC 1506 (Comm) (18 June 2025)
The Commercial Court refused Eraaya’s mandatory injunction for release of $40 million bond proceeds, joined the bondholders, and addressed collateral use of disclosed materials.
Segulah Medical Acceleration AB & Ors v Tripathi & Anor [2025] EWHC 632 (Ch) (21 March 2025)
The High Court held that the BVI injunction did not breach a non-enforcement undertaking, refused to set aside permission for collateral use, and rejected a tracing application on one issue.
Interlocutory dispute over freezing orders, collateral use, tracing, and trust disclosure in alleged deceit claims arising from SMT share sales.
The court held that each claimant has a real prospect of defeating a limitation defence under s.32 Limitation Act 1980, as there are material disputes of fact regarding concealment and discoverability of the alleged unlawful acts, which require determination at trial. The court further held that the Ledgers are subject to a continuing restriction order from the Leveson Inquiry, and pleadings relying on information from the Ledgers cannot proceed unless the restriction is lifted. Temporary reporting restrictions and anonymity for journalists were justified at this interlocutory stage to protec…
Source excerpt
Explore more
