Mehul Choksi v The Government of India & Ors
Security for costs was ordered because the claimant is resident abroad, there is a real risk of non-enforcement of costs orders, the merits do not demonstrate a high probability of success, and there is insufficient evidence that the claim would be stifled by the order.
Source excerpt
- Security for costs
- State immunity
- Jurisdiction
- Forum non conveniens
- False imprisonment
- Conspiracy