Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kyte v MclAren Automotive Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 1126 (TCC) (19 May 2026)
The High Court struck out inadequately particularised contract and negligence claims over a car fire, but allowed time to amend the pleadings.
The Tribunal found Home London Ltd was a letting agent and that holding deposits were fees that had to be published, but reduced both financial penalties to £2,500.
Crane & Anor v Yorkshire Yurts Ltd [2025] EWCC 63 (31 October 2025)
County Court claim over an unusable wedding yurt. The court found breach of contract and Consumer Rights Act terms, awarding a refund and compensation for disappointment.
The High Court held that the game rules, not the operator’s contrary terms, determined the on-screen jackpot result and granted summary judgment for the claimant.
Blaine v Touchstone Corporate Ltd [2025] EWHC 982 (Ch) (02 May 2025)
Interlocutory ruling on strike out and amendment in a financial advice negligence claim, with some FCA-based pleadings struck out and limited amendments allowed.
Durber v PPB Entertainment Ltd [2025] EWHC 498 (KB) (05 March 2025)
The High Court held that the claimant was entitled to the Monster Jackpot shown on screen. The game rules took priority, and clauses B1 and B2 were not incorporated and were unfair.
Perrett v Wolferstans LLP [2025] EWHC 68 (SCCO) (17 January 2025)
The court held the retainer was a CFA, not a DBA or valid NCBA, and rejected challenges based on the SRA Code and Consumer Rights Act 2015.
The tribunal struck out Skye Forecourt Limited’s appeal because it had no jurisdiction over fixed penalty notices issued under the Tobacco and Primary Services (Scotland) Act 2010.
The payment term requiring full advance payment regardless of whether the trial proceeded was unfair under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, fell within the 'grey list', and could not be relied upon by the claimants. The claimants had no contractual or quantum meruit right to payment after the trial was adjourned.
Source excerpt
Glaser & Anor v Atay [2024] EWCA Civ 1111 (03 October 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that a fixed-fee Payment Term in public access barristers’ contracts was unfair under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and not binding.
Explore more
