Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
County Court judgment on alleged race and religion discrimination and victimisation in Conservative Party candidate approval and disciplinary proceedings.
Xerox (UK) Ltd & Ors v Zeb [2017] EWCA Civ 2137 (14 December 2017)
The Court of Appeal struck out a purported discrimination claim based on redundancy risk, but remitted the remaining claims to the Employment Tribunal.
The Court of Appeal held that a ban on contract workers was a one-off act, not a continuing act, so the race discrimination claims were out of time.
MA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1426 (16 December 2008)
Court of Appeal held that most of Dr Ma’s race discrimination complaints could not be excluded as out of time before the merits hearing.
Court of Appeal case on whether a race discrimination complaint was timely as a continuing act, and whether earlier allegations should be left for the merits hearing.
Lyfar v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 1548 (14 November 2006)
The Court of Appeal upheld the Employment Tribunal’s refusal to hear most of a race discrimination claim out of time and dismissed the appeal.
Akinmolasire v Camden and Islington Mental Health NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 1351 (06 October 2004)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an employee’s appeal in a race discrimination case, holding the tribunal had decided an unpleaded complaint not raised in the originating application.
Henry v London Borough of Newham [2004] EWCA Civ 377 (05 March 2004)
Court of Appeal dismissed a race discrimination appeal, holding the Employment Tribunal had not erred on continuing acts, time limits, or the factual findings.
Bayliss v London Borough Of Hounslow [2002] EWCA Civ 354 (21 March 2002)
Court of Appeal upheld the strike-out of race discrimination and victimisation claims, finding no continuing act and no legal error in treating the 19 August 1994 incident as non-actionable.
Explore more
