Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to the limited rollout of PAVA spray in three Young Offender Institutions, finding no breach of equality or inquiry duties.
The High Court dismissed Ms Omirou’s extradition appeal to Cyprus, rejecting challenges to the warrant’s particulars, prosecution decision, delay, proportionality, and Article 8 rights.
Omirou v Cypriot Judicial Authority [2025] EWHC 599 (Admin) (14 March 2025)
The High Court dismissed Ms Omirou’s extradition appeal to Cyprus, upholding findings on warrant particularisation, prosecution decision, delay, proportionality and Article 8.
Misko v Regional Court In Bydgoszcz, Poland [2022] EWHC 3133 (Admin) (08 December 2022)
Extradition appeal dismissed. The court held the European Arrest Warrant gave sufficient particulars, offence 3 was extraditable, and no bar arose under section 12A or Article 8.
Whittle, R. v [2019] EWCA Crim 1897 (25 October 2019)
The Court of Appeal upheld a confiscation order against Anita Whittle, holding that the full misappropriated sum was the benefit obtained and was not disproportionate.
The Court of Appeal held that a confiscation order could include the full ÂŁ26,901.30 obtained by dishonesty, rejecting a deduction for hypothetical pension rights.
The High Court adjourned an extradition appeal so Hackney Children’s Services could reassess the appellant’s daughter’s care arrangements before Article 8 proportionality was decided.
High Court dismissed an extradition appeal to Poland, finding no persuasive Article 8 basis to refuse return and no procedural unfairness by the Polish authorities.
Jawad v R [2013] EWCA Crim 644 (03 May 2013)
The Court of Appeal held that a confiscation order is only disproportionate if it makes the defendant pay twice for money already restored to the victim.
Extradition appeal dismissed: the court held that the child-welfare impact of the claimant’s removal did not meet the exceptional Article 8 threshold.
Explore more
